I’m talking about the Barrack Huessein Obama who was elected President of the United States after many irregularities leading up to his nomination.
1. Obama received an apparent “sign on bonus” through a sham real estate transaction where he was able to acquire real estate way below market value. I believe a search under Tony Rezco will enlighten those who don’t know about this.
2. Obama won a Senate seat as a possible result of result of influence peddeling. Too few people have asked the question of all the places Obama could have launched his political career from: “Why did Obama choose Chicago? A prominent Democrat, former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich went to jail over trying to “sell” Obama’ Senate seat.
3. There were other, very experienced Democratic contenders who wanted that Senate seat. They were told to stand down, presumably paid off, in order to let Obama win it basically uncontested.
4. Hillary was leading Obama in the primaries before the media overnight started to support Obama and starting trashing Hillary. What entity was behind this? Mother Putin? Or was it just Soros? The Democratic Party has a long history with the labor unions as did Russia, formally known as the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Philosophically, there are many simularities between the Left and Russia. This relationship started in about the 1920s.
5. All this before Obama was even President. As President, Obama decimated our millitary, FBI, intelligence agencies, and police either by firing and replacing key people, applying pressure to them through media, or applying internal pressure. There were many exceptional people that resigned in protest over their treatment in the Obama administration. This received scant coverage in the US media.
6. Obama created several “Czars”, a Russian word to further his policy in several areas. More significantly, Obama created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and installed those who had little experience other than helping Obama’s political campaigns. These new Government workers were paid an exceptionally large salary outright, without even considering these workers lack of experience, low responsibility, or low professional requirements.
7. 1 billion dollars spent on creating a website for Obamacare. The website had many issues from day one. $300 in the private sector would get a solid website setup that would have worked on day one. Where did all that extra money go?
8. Obamacare. Healthcare times have gone up, doubling in a lot of cases. The price of healthcare has soared, with some drugs going up thousands of percent in notable examples. Businesses became reluctant to hire full time employees because of the expense of this program.
9. Obama expanded the requirement of businesses to use certain environmental testing companies, engineers, and remediators for certain transactions, increasing development times, costs, and risk to businesses. Businesses preferred to hold cash rather than invest, resulting in a lukewarm economic recovery in spite of near zero short term interest rates, QEs 1, 2, and 3, TARP and Economic Recovery acts.
10. Obama was able to successfully structure the economic stimulus package to be weighted to the later part of his term where it would be calculated to help him politically.
This is the Obama I’m talking about. People have been accused for being a traitor for less. Under the Obama administration millions, if not billions of dollars were removed directly or indirectly from public funds and businesses to go to Obama created businesses in order to create a political kickback system.
The moderate Democrats should be ashamed of themselves for allowing the Radical Left to whine about how the $130,000 payment to Stormy was structured. By the way, even there Stormy did not perform. (Her end of the agreement).
Do we need to explore the Solyndra fiasco and use it as a detailed case study for Obama’s and the Radical Left’s corruption?
To answer your question about nuclear war, the United States has been doing well: No nuclear attacks for 73 years. Besides, in the current “modern era”, I rate nuclear weapons as only the fifth most scary weapons of mass destruction. Still powerful enough to end the relevance of the human race, though. More specifically, it would be a global foreign affairs benefit if the Democrats and Republicans agreed to a sound set of principles in foreign policy. Russia wants to reclaim their former territories, we don’t want them to under Putin. All parties are playing a game where miscalculation could end badly. Real badly. The question is, should the United States get out of Putin’s (AKA Mr. Polonium) way or should we oppose his every move until he dies and a more moderate Russian leader emerges?
Obama is case study why we don’t want those with Socialistic or Radical Left types of philosophy in our Government, especially in leadership positions. Such philiosophy can only polarize our people and political decisions. Including possible nuclear decisions under stressful conditions during transfers of power, for example.