Chilean fascist kicks bucket

Quote from tradermaji:


Looks like leftist Venezuela isn't doing that badly. They have oil and that is their source of wealth.

Stupid statements like this cause you to appear moronic.

Are you crediting Chavez for Venezuela's petro revenue?

Have you ever visited Santiago? Or Caracas? If you've been to both I'd guess you too were startled by the difference. In fact Santiago and perhaps BA are the only cities in SA that the average American would feel comfortable living. Of course you being a Louisianian, Caracas probably feels more than a bit like home.....
 
Quote from Cesko:

Pinochet is responsible for probably the only one properly functioning country in SA. What's more human, few socialist scumbags dead (incl. alcoholic Allende) or country in disarray(Cuban way and far more people dead in a long run).

THANK YOU GENERAL FOR LIFELONG SERVICE OF FIGHTING A SOCIALIST SCUM WITH NO APOLOGOGIES.

As usual you and AAA get it. Pinochet was a hero who ultimately SAVED lives by killing scum..........
 
caracas.JPG


s9r.jpg
 
Quote from tradermaji:

Latin American Countries listed by GDP.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Latin_American_countries_by_GDP

Rank Country 2006 GDP
millions of US dollars
— World 44,168,157
— Latin America 2,823,173
1 Brazil 966,827
2 Mexico 811,282
3 Argentina 219,652
4 Venezuela 164,416
5 Chile 140,389
6 Colombia 129,384

Per Capita Income of countries around the world. Check it to find the Per Capita Income of Chile and compare it to other communist or leftist countries in that region.

http://www.finfacts.com/biz10/globalworldincomepercapita.htm

Chile 4930 5870 51
Venezuela, RB 4030 4810 59

(a couple of countries have a higher per capita income than Chile that are part of Latin America:
Antigua and Barbuda 10130 10920 35
Trinidad and Tobago 9070 10440 37 )


Population of Venezuela:26,749,000
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela

Population of Chile:16,132,674
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chile

Looks like leftist Venezuela isn't doing that badly. They have oil and that is their source of wealth.

What you showed here is called "well chosen example".
 
Looks like leftist Venezuela isn't doing that badly. They have oil and that is their source of wealth.
Are you truly serious with this example? I find it hard to believe.
 
Quote from Pekelo:

Quote from Cesko:

Pinochet is responsible for probably the only one properly functioning country in SA.

If you really challenge me, I can do the exact math, but I would say at least 80% of SA is capitalist. So are you criticizing capitalism? :)

You see that is the beauty of democracy, if people want to be stupid, let them be. If they like nazism and vote for it, let them be nazist. If they want communism and they vote for it, let them be communist.

What would you call that crazy thing? Oh yes, democracy... Evil thing, ain't it? :)

Chile's GDP per capita second best after Argentina.(Compare Chile to Antigua is a non-sense). Remember Argentina used to be one of the richest countries in the world. In order for capitalism to work you need a strong law, Pinochet provided it along with rational economic policies (M. Friedman- advisor)
Regarding democracy, after experiencing "democracy" in action here in the U.S., I don't think all people should automatically have the right to vote. That's where socialist garbage gets its power from,through retarded most common denominator which has no clue.
If there is a country closest to the ideal of democracy it's Switzerland. Interesting thing, Swiss didn't allow women to vote until 1972, guess why. (Do not tell me highlanders are stupid people.)

P.S. USA wasn't democracy until (roughly) WW1. Since that time the bolshevic cancer begun to spread around the world.
 
Quote from Cesko:

Chile's GDP per capita second best after Argentina.

You are mistaking me with the other guy, (I didn't say anything about GDPs) but since both countries are capitalist, you don't have a point here...

Regarding democracy, after experiencing "democracy" in action here in the U.S.,

I am sorry, but so far you haven't, thus your premise is already faulty.

I don't think all people should automatically have the right to vote.

Because that would be democratic? So only people who agree with YOU, should be allowed to vote. That is called dictatorship...

That's where socialist garbage gets its power from,through retarded most common denominator which has no clue.

Already adressed this in my previous post. Democracy doesn't say just how smart are the people. If they vote for something bad, you have to take it. Like marriage...

If there is a country closest to the ideal of democracy it's Switzerland. Interesting thing, Swiss didn't allow women to vote until 1972, guess why.

Let me guess, women are better at money management? So now that those damn wumen are able to vote, Switzerland still #1 on your list?

Why didn't you pick an Arab country where everyone vote for the only party and women can't vote? THAT would be your favorite example...

P.S. USA wasn't democracy until (roughly) WW1.

Did you know that women can vote in the US? Also people not agreeing with you. There is no such a thing as a perfect world...
 
What the fuck are you talking about???
All I can say you got me. I am out of here.
I am not gonna waste my time explaining my points.
 
Democracy is not a religion. Just because a leader was democratically elected does not mean he cannot be evil. We see that now in the middle east, with terrorist governments being elected by popular vote. Should that insulate them from accountability or responsibility for their actions?

It is ironic that many of the same people who vilify Pinochet and the CIA were all in favor of our forcing regime change in the former Yugoslovia. They thought Clinton was brilliant to engage in high altitude terror bombing of civilians. They object to regime change in Iraq however. They seem to think it is acceptable for us to act only when we have no vital interests at stake.

Would we be worse off if we had backed the coup that briefly overthrew the Castro-wannabe thug Chavez in Venezuela? Our sqeemishness resulted in him reclaiming power and being able to use their oil wealth to export marxism to every country in the region and back a guerilla army destablizing our best ally Colombia.
 
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:

Stupid statements like this cause you to appear moronic.

Are you crediting Chavez for Venezuela's petro revenue?

Have you ever visited Santiago? Or Caracas? If you've been to both I'd guess you too were startled by the difference. In fact Santiago and perhaps BA are the only cities in SA that the average American would feel comfortable living. Of course you being a Louisianian, Caracas probably feels more than a bit like home.....

Please... morons like you should not post...

I credit for Chavez managing the petro revenue properly and not letting the vultures feasting on it.

Of course, morons like you will make fun of one of America's state... Ooopss... I forgot you are from Afganistan.
 
Back
Top