He said monthly distribution of a government program would lead to more overdoses. Euclid’s first law would apply.
And let’s be honest here, you’re pretty dumb.
Wow do I feel bad, you sure told me
He said monthly distribution of a government program would lead to more overdoses. Euclid’s first law would apply.
And let’s be honest here, you’re pretty dumb.
And um who pays for it? I'd be for it if it comes from current tax levels. Or current budget.
This is one of the dumbest things you've ever posted on this site.
I'm all for helping kids in need, of course.
My point is that if poor people know that the government will pay them thousands of dollars a year per child, they may have additional children they can't afford to raise. I think people should give careful thought to pregnancy and only, to the best of their ability, have children they can afford.
I feel bad for kids in poverty, parental responsibility is important. It's an old debate. I believe folks should only have kids they can afford to raise, otherwise you get endless poverty cycle.
I was truly saddened when I saw poor Detroit neighborhoods when I worked at Ford. The hopelessness you see in inner-city eyes is heartwrenching.
The child tax credit is not an anti poverty program
The poverty line is an arbitrary number based on the bottom end of wealthThread title:
Child tax credit cuts childhood poverty in half
Seems about right.
Thread title:
Child tax credit cuts childhood poverty in half
Seems about right.
The poverty line is an arbitrary number based on the bottom end of wealth
There will always be a bottom 20%...Statistically Poverty will never go away...its become an industry complex between Govt and Non profits and churches
This is why poverty levels have been flat for 60 years
![]()
You need to look from the bottom up
Do the poor have a comfortable life with a standard way of living.
Not whether they can take European vacations
![]()