Child Molesting Conservative Regains Lead In Alabama

Slartibartfast said:
"To mark the "National Day of Prayer" today, Trump will make good on a campaign promise to eliminate the so-called Johnson Amendment, an arcane bit of 1950s-era lawmaking that does two things: 1. It bars charitable organizations, non-profit groups and churches from making political endorsements and 2. Preserves our democracy."
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...-play-politics-thanks-trump-article-1.3136449
More...
I'm totally confused. If the "Johnson Amendment" is law passed by the Congress and signed by the then President Johnson, and assuming it hasn't been repealed by a subsequent act of Congress, then it is still statutory law and Trump can sign all the executive orders he wants to, and it will still be law. It would have to be repealed by Congress. So what is going on here. Is this just another Trump Stunt aimed at to hoodwinking his know-nothing supporters.???
 
jem said:
If I thought the claims by the 14 year old were credible I would not vote for him. but her claims don't seem credible because I don't seem him signing her yearbook with his clerks initials. For instance Gloria Allred should have had that issue taken care of prior to her press conference. Either have had it verified by experts or not brought this crap up at all.

I don't thinking dating a 17 year old makes him a child molester but it is a bit creepy for a guy in his 30s to make a habit of it.

But let me also say its gets creepier as the guy gets older.
I have 2 high school age boys. I see high school age girls often.
I let my wife take them out on the boat... I don't even want to go out on the boat with them because I don't want to be seen as a creep.

it would be creepy if a guy my age dated 17 year old girls.

I think it was very wrong for bill and hillary to go to pedo island.

p.s. I just thought about this more.
if my daughter was in high school and I was taking her and her friends out on the boat... it might be ok... So I am not speaking about all times on a boat. Just my subjective feeling about it. Its like going to cardio classes. if you are there with a women... it feels less questionable.
More...
TMI bro!
 
piezoe said:
I'm totally confused. If the "Johnson Amendment" is law passed by the Congress and signed by the then President Johnson, and assuming it hasn't been repealed by a subsequent act of Congress, then it is still statutory law and Trump can sign all the executive orders he wants to, and it will still be law. It would have to be repealed by Congress. So what is going on here. Is this just another Trump Stunt aimed at to hoodwinking his know-nothing supporters.???
More...

You are of course correct he could not.

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-m...ump-claims-he-got-rid-johnson-amendment-true/

Amuses me sometimes that the original "know-nothing" nativist party were selective, the current lot actually know nothing.
 
Arnie said:
Then why is she so afraid to have the signature analyzed by a third party?
More...

Didn't she say that she is OK with Congress investigating this, why would she hand over evidence to a third party. Let Moore call the FBI on her or sue her for defamation if it was all a fabrication.
 
gwb-trading said:
Yeah if the left can boycott North Carolina for not allowing perverts to molest little girls in restrooms; I am sure they can further muddy their moral standing in a campaign to boycott Alabama for electing an alleged pedophile.
More...

Can you give examples of left allowing perverts to molest girls or you are just channeling conservatism like pedo Moore and Trump?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top