Quote from stu:
What power? The people who think he's right will agree with him those who don't won't.
Sure if he thinks a specific business does not reflect what he sees as meeting his city's standards , in this case social inclusiveness, he has every right to say so. Whether he has any legal power to do anything is another matter altogether.
It could be said his comment went toward helping the specific business encouraging a spurt in the level of trade they've never had before. What youâre suggesting would push these sleazy politicians even further into their own murky world, restricting what they can openly say so the public at large could never know what their opinions are or what they really think.
You want to stop free speech because it might have an effect on some things!? Like I say, are you being serious?
What I'm saying is Rahm's opinion on what the guy said is irrelevant to the duties of his office unless the mayor is pushing an agenda, which then makes it a political hit job on that particular establishment. Clear abuse of power.
The mayor is perfectly free to claim his support for gay marriage as often as he likes. What he can't do is use his opinion as a political weapon to oppress a particular business just because that businessman has a different opinion.
