Of course and whatever! But none of these considerations will let the Chicagoans (Chicagonese?) out of their obligations. Pay what you owe and then re-evaluate. Teacher salaries may deserve to be cut in half, but frankly I doubt that. Nevertheless if that's done you might as well give up on public education altogether, and hence on any semblance of democracy. I wouldn't work in the Chicago schools for half the salary and neither will anyone else you might want to hire.Quote from zdreg:
of course, as if the students coming out of the chicago system are stellar performers. teacher salaries deserve to be cut in half for their miserable performance which is akin to being overpaid, glorified baby sitters. e.g. 20% of 8th grade students read at grade level.
cry me a river for these people who would have great difficulty getting a job in the private sector, even in good times.
Quote from Free Thinker:
why when they do succeed if placed in well off white schools?
Quote from piezoe:
Of course and whatever! But none of these considerations will let the Chicagoans (Chicagonese?) out of their obligations. Pay what you owe and then re-evaluate. Teacher salaries may deserve to be cut in half, but frankly I doubt that. Nevertheless if that's done you might as well give up on public education altogether, and hence on any semblance of democracy. I wouldn't work in the Chicago schools for half the salary and neither will anyone else you might want to hire.
By definition, no solution is realistic if it does not incorporate making good on current obligations. Otherwise you'll end up paying not only what you owe the teachers, but lawyers as well. And that would just be plain stupid.
Quote from billyjoerob:
Money printing doesn't cause inflation. This is a myth. If it did, wudda already happened. MV=PY so it's not just the amount of money it's also velocity and in a world that's getting really old fast, velocity is not going to be accelerating any time soon. See Japan. Plus there are huge forces of deflation working against inflation. India and China entering the global labor force, unstoppable immigration, the internet, etc. Plus in the new services economy, there aren't the same capacity limits on production. So all the factors that lead to inflation, such as shortages of goods and demographic bulges, are no longer relevant. So to put a bow on it, money is just one, not particularly important, factor contributing to inflation. And in any case we need more inflation, not less, to boost the housing market and wages back to the old watermark and get people back into the labor and housing markets.
Quote from Free Thinker:
when did inner city kids ever have the nice new schools the rich suburbs have?
george bush talked about no child left behind, which i thought was a good idea, but there was never any money behind it. it has since failed.
Quote from zdreg:
no capacity limits on production you stated them but u have not offered proof