chf crosses

it is very easily justifiable. It keeps crazy cowboys from taking insane positions that harm themselves and put the broker into a potentially precarious situation. Also consider especially in otc markets that IB has to source the liquidity from somewhere. And I bet you they already have a lot of work to do to sort out discrepancies last night between fills they reported on their client side vs fills with their liquidity providers.

Long story short, IB capping orders makes most of the times sense. The exception would be closing position orders where some work should be done.

I've complained to IB repeatedly about their idiotic capping algorithm and no one listens. It would not be hard for them to bring up a confirmation box asking if you really, really, really want to submit an order at a particular price, but they refuse to do that. Whoever is responsible for this decision at IB should really ask themselves if they know better than their customers at what prices they should be able to trade at. Because right now IB is saying it knows better than you. And in a fast moving market you cannot control your risk. IB is trying to make it safer to trade but in this case they are just making things more dangerous. Please, I would love someone from IB to come on these boards and justify this price capping decision.
 
lol, well you just did. Unsolicited rambling about how you protect others' integrity...(well unless of course I missed something because you replied to someone I block).

Numerous reasons why I don't give advice.

Primarily, out of respect to the individual who shared his methodology with me. We had an understanding that I would never disclose the information he shared publicly. I honor my word. Which is why I do not post annotated technical charts.

Secondly, regurgitating generic trading advice and catch phrases is a useless endeavor. Just as is giving partial information. Tell a noobie how to enter a trade, but not how to manage his risk is irresponsible. (just to say he should use stops is not enough). A job worth doing is worth doing right. Either teach the man everything he needs to know or keep quiet. I choose the latter.

Thirdly, answering a SPECIFIC well thought out question, which exhibits the individual has put forth the effort and only needs clarification is fine.

Directing one to the source of information and/or assisting with technical issues is also fine.

Offering unsolicited advice, taunting, deriding someone on how they should have done something is another matter. Hindsight is 20/20, easy to throw stones and be degrading. Constructive advise is fine, but it should be requested and not shoved down someones throat.

In regards to the individual I was addressing, I believe he is an experienced trader. There is no advice I could or should give him that he isn't already aware of. We all have losing trades, draw downs, fat finger mistakes, bad timing, etc... part of trading. Notice he lost 10% of his net worth, he didn't blow up. All a part of trading, he lived to trade another day. What else is there to say?

Some people like to hear their own voice, regardless what rubbish they exude. I am not one of them.
 
LuisHK, google "TWS Audit Trail". I have not had the need to retrieve such but remember that TWS keeps a log of each and every smallest activity happening in your system. The exact timestamp and order details of your submission, reception by the gateway, IB's server and how they handle it. Of course all unless the connection goes down. If you seriously want to arbitrate or clarify then you should request the audit trail on IB's side.

Btw, the platform freeze or blue light is not because of any capped orders. I do not want to speculate too much but I am almost 100% certain that it is IB's way of saying that their liquidity providers either shut down quoting themselves or went maniac in terms of causing incalculable risks with how they fill orders. Even IB is taking a risk because despite their ECN spot fx model the price aggregation still happens on their servers and hence they are in legal terms an intermediary that has contracts with their clients and other contracts with their liquidity providers. Most of the times when I had similar situation occurring it was because their liquidity providers caused issues.

Its hard to pinpoint the exact issue but if it is blue and you do not get the order reception acknowledgement then I do not believe it is related to order capping but more something on the technical side with their liquidity providers (IB"s order book messed up, pulled quotes, rejects, ...by liquidity providers. Everyone protects themselves against extreme market environments and I would not be surprised at all if liquidity providers reserved a right to reject trades in extreme circumstances...even on an ECN platform. (As a matter of fact some ECNs still have last look provisions granted to their liquidity providers)

Atrocious

Bad day here in the office indeed. The fact I closed the euro stocks (US markets were closed) before they rallied big time to limit the risk as I couldn't touch the eurchf didn't help.
But the orders capped were on the eurchf spot market. When the first bids came up on the futures and I placed orders there, the orders just remained with the blue light on, ie not transmitted yet.
Also when I ticked the "don't cap" case it just came with a larger pop up and the platform froze.It happened twice.

Does anyone know how can I download the order activity log, where it shows orders didn't get through ?
 
Last edited:
lol, well you just did. Unsolicited rambling about how you protect others' integrity...(well unless of course I missed something because you replied to someone I block).
LOL, ya I did ramble a bit there. I was replying to a direct (solicited) question to an individual that is most likely on many ignore lists. This may clarify my response a bit.

ExperiencedJoe said:
How come ? Because you just know I am waiting for a free ride ?

A simple advice would be to use stops and sizes wisely. These will allow proper trading and offer protection at the same time.
 
Back
Top