Quote from Lucrum:
Besides being filthy dirty and looking ridiculous?
How many truly successful men do you see wearing dreadlocks?
Most I see are homeless, gangsters or janitors.
You almost never see a respected professional wearing dreadlocks.
There's a reason for that.
Quote from denner:
I don't think you're going anywhere with this one, RCG. Let's face it, dreadlocks past age 50 is a bit "out there" to say the least.
It's kind of like being the 35 year old guy still wearing his hat backwards. Trying to judge ANYONE who doesn't "know or hang out" with guys with dreadlocks is a pretty stupid bone of contention.
I don't have a problem with it, but like tatoos or any other means of personal expression, it does close some doors that one might not want closed.
RCG isn't a successful trader. He claims he's a nurse, personally I think he's a janitor.Quote from Fractals 'R Us:
Trading pays more than any other profession and nobody gives a rat's ass how you look if it's your own money.. Hee hee, how do you know how successful those people you are seeing are?....
Less than 1 in 50 people are.Quote from RCG Trader:
1. Im not 50.
You have culture? Funny, it doesn't show.2. you know little if anything about my culture.
Who writes your check? Oh, a corporation. I see.3. I have a profession, independent of corporate America. Do you?
But it isn't just Lucrum. You seem to have everyone angry with you. It must be over the blatant misrepresentations in your posts and the personal attacks.4. Luke brought this on himself, as per his usual.
Quote from Lucrum:
RCG conveniently had to get ready for his third shift of mopping floors before being able to answer the questions.
"What are you going to lie to us about today dreadlocks boy?
How many truly successful men do you see wearing dreadlocks?"
Oh well, maybe tomorrow.
Maybe RCG could man up and follow his own directive.Quote from RCG Trader:
05-02-12 10:34 AM
...Now don't you go running away at a focused question now.
A mop for a hair style? Or a mop as my primary work tool? You're right.Quote from RCG Trader:
Oy!
Luke, you will never, ever, have what I possess. And that is good enuf for me![]()
So, three Volt's catch on fire (after being severly crash tested) and it's a design problem but 250,000 other cars catch fire a year and it's because of driver error?Quote from Tsing Tao:
Dude, lots of things sound the way you want them when you drive a one way street like you do. It's called convenient, and it tends to work in your own little world.
The cars had a design problem that caused battery leakage in certain types of accidents. This leakage later led to a fire. End of story! Whether that was, or was not fixed (government claims are worthless) is up to the decision of the buyer. In this case, I am the buyer.
But even had I not had the main issue of buying a car from a company that took a government bailout, I still wouldn't buy the volt because of the past issues. Hell, buying the first version of a car is always a risky bet. Got it?
If you need it to be clearer, I suppose I can put it in a pop up book.
Again, I'm not telling you what to buy - you're trying to tell me what to buy. I'm telling you, in essence, to get lost.