I find it both inevitable and a bit puzzling that many chess players are HFMs. Inevitable because chess is quantitative and approaching anything from an analytical point of view will get you half way.
No wonder he did so well - he had a silicon beast!
Karjakin is the perfect opponent for Magnus. Rarely puts pressure on the opponent and sits back like a python and strangles you when you overextend. Good luck beating Magnus that way.Based on their ratings, recent performance, and head-to-head score, Karjakin will have his work cut out for him. But this is a match, and preparations (especially opening preparations) can play a significant role. Looking forward to it!


I don't know who will be doing the strangling. Carlsen isn't an aggressive, swashbuckling player himself. He likes to play for small, riskless advantages and constrict his opponents. But he admits that sometimes he underestimates his opponents' positions and the potential for counter-attacks, so we'll see.Karjakin is the perfect opponent for Magnus. Rarely puts pressure on the opponent and sits back like a python and strangles you when you overextend. Good luck beating Magnus that way.
The right way to beat Magnus is to get him into a position where he underestimates slow-forming attacks on his King where the danger is not obvious. I suffer horribly from the same affliction. Hide intentions in "positional" moves.![]()