Quote from deaddog:
Regarding position size do you have any limits on the number of stocks you will hold at one time or the maximum dollar amount one position will amount to?
No limit to the number of stocks but usually I hold no more than 6-8 at a time but i have had as many as 10. The number does not matter. It is the TOTAL amount of capital at risk that is important. No limit as to maximum dollar amount. I made one trade in the past that took up 76% of my trading capital in one trade but only risked 0.75% because I had such a tight stop. If my stop loss is REALLY tight then I am able to buy more shares. Do you understand what I mean by that ("...buy more shares with tight stop loss...")?
In my case I will not hold over 8 stocks at one time. I will not tie up more than 15% of my account on any one trade. I usually shoot for 12.5% making each trade the same dollar size.
Ok,...here is where I think you are not using Van Tharps rule correctly. Correct me if I misunderstand you. We do NOT care the amount of capital dollars per trade. We only care the amount of capital dollars AT RISK. It does not make sense to ALLOCATE the same fixed % of your portfolio (12.5% as you say) because each instrument you trade will have varying volatility and will be varying degrees away from your stop loss price. What you want to do is RISK the same fixed % per trade (~1% or so).
So for example you have a stock you want to buy at $100 and you have $100K acct size and you determine your stop is at $99. That is $1 away from purchase price so you could by a MAXIMUM of 1000 shares of the $100 stock and only RISK $1000 (1%). Obviously 1000 * $100 = $100K so you COULD allocate all of your trade capital on this one trade but only
RISK 1%. Does that make sense? If it were a $2 stop loss at $98 instead then you could only buy 500 shares ($1000/$2 = 500 shares) and you are STILL only RISKING $1000 but in this case you have ALLOCATED $50K of your trading capital....(and 333 shares with $3 stop loss, etc...). Do you see how your position size diminishes the wider your stop is? This also protects you with more volatile stocks because they move more rapidly and your stop would obviously be farther away than other stocks. That is why I can buy fewer shares of a 2X ETF and STILL make the same amount of money without ALLOCATING the same amount of capital. So my capital is being used more efficiently but I am still RISKING the same amount. Make sense?
That is how Van Tharp describes fixed % RISK of capital. Not 12.5% of your capital among 8 different trades to total $100K. You could have $5k in one trade , $12K in another, $8K in another and so forth but EACH one risks $1000.
I limit my TOTAL risk to 6% at any one time. So if I have a pofitable trade and I move my stop to a profit then I can take on a new trade with 1% risk because I have 0% at risk on the profitable one....I am only playing with the house's money on the profitable trade & NOT my own.
I know this was a long post but I hope you took the time to read and digest this. This is VITAL to trading correctly.
Good Luck.