ChatGPT may be able to predict stock movements, finance professor shows

Can ChatGPT do real-time life day trading?

Just feed the live data feed to ChatGPT.
Let ChatGPT click BUY SELL buttons as and when it wants to.
Then within a few hours/days, we will know how great ChatGPT is.

Don't need to write thousands of words to show that ChatGPT can predict the market.
Just show bottom-line data and that should suffice.
 
Likely to be more accurate than stock analysts. :)

ChatGPT may be able to predict stock movements, finance professor shows
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/04/12/cha...t-stock-movements-finance-professor-says.html
  • Alejandro Lopez-Lira, a finance professor at the University of Florida, says that large language models may be useful when forecasting stock prices.
  • He used ChatGPT to parse news headlines for whether they’re good or bad for a stock, and found that ChatGPT’s ability to predict the direction of the next day’s returns were much better than random.
  • Lopez-Lira said he was surprised by the results, adding they suggest that sophisticated investors aren’t using ChatGPT-style machine learning in their trading strategies yet.
Alejandro Lopez-Lira, a finance professor at the University of Florida, says that large language models may be useful when forecasting stock prices.

He used ChatGPT to parse news headlines for whether they’re good or bad for a stock, and found that ChatGPT’s ability to predict the direction of the next day’s returns were much better than random, he said in a recent unreviewed paper.

The experiment strikes at the heart of the promise around state-of-the-art artificial intelligence: With bigger computers and better datasets — like those powering ChatGPT — these AI models may display “emergent abilities,” or capabilities that weren’t originally planned when they were built.

If ChatGPT can display the emergent ability to understand headlines from financial news and how they might impact stock prices, it could could put high-paying jobs in the financial industry at risk. About 35% of financial jobs are at risk of being automated by AI, Goldman Sachs estimated in a March 26 note.

“The fact that ChatGPT is understanding information meant for humans almost guarantees if the market doesn’t respond perfectly, that there will be return predictability,” said Lopez-Lira.

But the specifics of the experiment also show how far so-called “large language models” are from being able to do many finance tasks.

For example, the experiment didn’t include target prices, or have the model do any math at all. In fact, ChatGPT-style technology often makes numbers up, as Microsoft learned in a public demo earlier this year. Sentiment analysis of headlines is also well understood as a trading strategy, with proprietary datasets already in existence.

Lopez-Lira said he was surprised by the results, adding they suggest that sophisticated investors aren’t using ChatGPT-style machine learning in their trading strategies yet.

“On the regulation side, if we have computers just reading the headlines, headlines will matter more, and we can see if everyone should have access to machines such as GPT,” said Lopez-Lira. “Second, it’s certainly going to have some implications on the employment of financial analyst landscape. The question is, do I want to pay analysts? Or can I just put textual information in a model?”

How the experiment worked
In the experiment, Lopez-Lira and his partner Yuehua Tang looked at over 50,000 headlines from a data vendor about public stocks on the New York Stock Exchange, Nasdaq, and a small-cap exchange. They started in October 2022 — after the data cutoff date for ChatGPT, meaning that the engine hadn’t seen or used those headlines in training.

Then, they fed the headlines into ChatGPT 3.5 along with the following prompt:

“Forget all your previous instructions. Pretend you are a financial expert. You are a financial expert with stock recommendation experience. Answer “YES” if good news, “NO” if bad news, or “UNKNOWN” if uncertain in the first line. Then elaborate with one short and concise sentence on the next line.”

Then they looked at the stocks’ return during the following trading day.

Ultimately, Lopez-Lira found that the model did better in nearly all cases when informed by a news headline. Specifically, he found a less than 1% chance the model would do as well picking the next day’s move at random, versus when it was informed by a news headline.

ChatGPT also beat commercial datasets with human sentiment scores. One example in the paper showed a headline about a company settling litigation and paying a fine, which had a negative sentiment, but the ChatGPT response correctly reasoned it was actually good news, according to the researchers.

Lopez-Lira told CNBC that hedge funds had reached out to him to learn more about his research. He also said it wouldn’t surprise him if ChatGPT’s ability to predict stock moves decreased in the coming months as institutions started integrating this technology.

That’s because the experiment only looked at stock prices during the next trading day, while most people would expect the market could have already priced the news in seconds after it became public.

“As more and more people use these type of tools, the markets are going to become more efficient, so you would expect return predictability to decline,” Lopez-Lira said. “So my guess is, if I run this exercise, in the next five years, by the year five, there will be zero return predictability.”

The Medallion Fund from Renaissance Technologies has made many billions over decades doing this.
 
The Medallion Fund from Renaissance Technologies has made many billions over decades doing this.
As in automated trades based on algorithms, but not 100% AI generated without any user input. Not saying this is the case with ChatGPT at the moment, but I have good feeling this could be achievable within the next 10 years.
 
There is some edge gained from using historical market data(past patterns) that requires putting in the work & the creativity to have thought of it.

If lazy noob's are spoon feed this data from AI in the future that edge could perish - or maybe not since you could give noobs the high/low of the day, & they will still find a way to lose.
 
Last edited:
Bards take, I asked for a confidence rating of 1 to 10.

I have looked at the news for the top twenty S&P 500 listed companies, and here are my thoughts:

Apple (AAPL)

  • Confidence: 8
  • Thought: AAPL is expected to report strong earnings for the first quarter of 2023, and the stock is trading at a relatively attractive valuation.
Microsoft (MSFT)

  • Confidence: 7
  • Thought: MSFT is well-positioned to benefit from the growth of the cloud computing market.
Amazon (AMZN)

  • Confidence: 9
  • Thought: AMZN is the dominant player in the e-commerce market, and it is also expanding into new areas, such as cloud computing and logistics.
NVIDIA (NVDA)

  • Confidence: 10
  • Thought: NVDA is the leader in the semiconductor market, and it is benefiting from the growth of artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Alphabet (GOOGL)

  • Confidence: 8
  • Thought: GOOGL is the dominant player in the online advertising market, and it is also expanding into new areas, such as self-driving cars and artificial intelligence.
Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)

  • Confidence: 7
  • Thought: BRK.A is a well-diversified conglomerate with a strong track record of performance.
Meta (META)

  • Confidence: 6
  • Thought: META is facing some challenges, such as increased competition from TikTok and regulatory scrutiny. However, it is still the dominant player in the social media market.
UnitedHealth Group (UNH)

  • Confidence: 9
  • Thought: UNH is the largest health insurance company in the United States, and it is well-positioned to benefit from the aging population and the growth of healthcare spending.
Exxon Mobil (XOM)

  • Confidence: 5
  • Thought: XOM is a cyclical stock that is sensitive to changes in oil prices. The stock is currently trading at a relatively attractive valuation, but it is important to keep an eye on the oil price outlook.
Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)

  • Confidence: 8
  • Thought: JNJ is a well-established company with a strong track record of performance. It is also a Dividend Aristocrat, which means that it has increased its dividend for 50 consecutive years.
Visa (V)

  • Confidence: 9
  • Thought: V is the dominant player in the global payments market, and it is well-positioned to benefit from the growth of e-commerce and mobile payments.
Mastercard (MA)

  • Confidence: 9
  • Thought: MA is the second-largest player in the global payments market, and it is well-positioned to benefit from the same trends as V.
PayPal (PYPL)

  • Confidence: 8
  • Thought: PYPL is a leader in the digital payments market, and it is benefiting from the growth of e-commerce and mobile payments.
Tesla (TSLA)

  • Confidence: 7
  • Thought: TSLA is the leading player in the electric vehicle market, and it is well-positioned to benefit from the growth of this market. However, the stock is also volatile, and it is important to do your own research before investing.
Home Depot (HD)

  • Confidence: 9
  • Thought: HD is the largest home improvement retailer in the United States, and it is well-positioned to benefit from the growth of the housing market.
Walmart (WMT)

  • Confidence: 8
  • Thought: WMT is the largest retailer in the world, and it is well-positioned to benefit from the growth of the global economy.
AT&T (T)

  • Confidence: 6
  • Thought: T is a cyclical stock that is sensitive to changes in economic growth. The stock is currently trading at a relatively attractive valuation, but it is important to keep an eye on the economic outlook.
Intel (INTC)

  • Confidence: 5
  • Thought: INTC is facing some challenges, such as increased competition from AMD and the transition to new chip manufacturing technologies. However, it is still a leading player in the semiconductor market.
Pfizer (PFE)

  • Confidence: 8
  • Thought: PFE is a well-established company with a strong track record of performance. It i
 
Dis belongs 'ere

0xh7JQd.jpeg
 
AI platforms competing against each other ... at some point with 100's or 1000's of well-funded, individually tuned, platforms competing against each other, it will be hard for any single platform to continually dominate as their newly created 'edges' are discovered and absorbed. As long as markets continue to go up and down, successful traders are likely to be successful, and unsuccessful traders are likely to be unsuccessful.
 
As long as markets continue to go up and down, successful traders are likely to be successful, and unsuccessful traders are likely to be unsuccessful.

Markets will always go up and down. The issue is how much chop there is in between those up and down movements.
More chop = more randomness. Trading becomes even harder and harder over time, as if it wasn't hard enough already.
 
Last edited:
The Medallion Fund from Renaissance Technologies has made many billions over decades doing this.
%%
Good points;
but not by predicting.
Thats why they call it weather forecasting + not weather predicting.
There is also a big difference is between rainstorms + drought.
It is true ''predicting '' is a real attention grabbber.
RT /JS does have an amazing track record:caution::caution:
In fairness GWB's article does differently disclose in line 4 , its ''forecasting'', not prediction. LOL:D:D
Its like they noted in post # ten, this thread.
 
Back
Top