Originally posted by dufferdon
. Take the free trial, but don't trade. Just observe very, very carefully. If anything doesn't pass the smell test run away. Better yet, if you are new to the game use the money to buy a whole bunch of well-recommended trading literature, study it very carefully and sort the wheat from the chaff yourselves. There are no shortcuts in my opinion.
) chat room has certain philosophy behind its trading approach, you better study it before taking trades, otherwise you are going to be lost in the trade details not even understanding some of the comments. Not that comments are confusing, they are just built on assumption that traders went through certain material... can't rely all the basics with each trade time and time again. Now and then I see trialers that do look for shortcuts. All attepmts to explain the trade in advance, show the foundation of the trade are met by them with "Where should I enter and what's the target?" Sometimes it feels like they are 1 word short of addition like "Save the blabbing!" 
The best chat room is a bunch of friends linked up with microphones in a private room on Yahoo Chat... preferably they should all be experienced traders, and have different areas of expertise.... 5 pairs of eyes looking objectively at 5 separate areas e.g. NYSE scalping, Nasdaq scalping, QQQ, Swings, Sectors... such a set-up produces results through excellent labor divisibility. Its all about finding the right people whose calls you can trust and who will trust your calls. Microphone link-ups allow for immediate discussion / clarification prior to trade entry.
Originally posted by dufferdon
Stocktrendwizard.com - Chris Terry
I have not yet had my free trial with Chris yet, perhaps I never will, so I have not seen him trade. However I have examined some of his examples. They seem less-clearly called than at RealityTrader. I understand "buy now", but a "buy idea" is much more difficult for me.
I also found ambiguities in the trade examples. I will just use one for illustration. I have copied it from Chris' site and I hope he will excuse the possible copyright infringement. The chart is attached below. The first two lines of the commentary read:
11:03:55 QLGC buy break above 48.40, we will see .30 cent stop
11:06:28 QLGC use 48.20 stop.
Sure enough on what appears to be the 11:05 bar there is a breakout above 48.40 to trigger a buy. That bar got to 48.57. Does that mean the stop was at 48.10 or at 48.27. I don't know, it is ambiguous. The 48.27 number was certainly hit on the next bar.
The next call is very clear, a stop at 48.20 at 11:06:28. However, the 11:06 bar got down to 48:17. Was the stop call made before that or after that? Again it is ambiguous. Nevertheless a quite successful trade was highlighted.
Please do not get all excited Chris. I am not accusing you of dishonesty. I am just pointing out the type of ambiguity that can be confusing to someone evaluating whether they want to use your service or not. There are other similar examples on your site and I am sure I have seen far worse examples on other sites.
Originally posted by volkl151
. Don, I swear my man, if you put half the energy into making cash as you do pulling other people down (who are just trying to make it easier for newer traders)... we'd be sending you a check for your picks.
:

Also, I think if it's still alive after all the early flames, it might survive, LOL