Quote from Ghost of Cutten:
1. AAPL has gone up a hell of a lot in a fairly short time. It is still, even after the recent selloff, massively above its 200 day moving average, and it reached a peak of around 16.5x ATR (20 day average true range) above the 200 day MA. That is historically very overbought. As a comparison, in 2000 at the peak, the nasdaq was 14.2x ATR (20) above the 200 day MA, and that was one of the most insane bubbles of all time. Other market peaks were things like oil 2008, or housing stocks in 2006, and my studies showed that about 12-14xATR above the 200 day MA is usually a time of serious risk after a lengthy and sizeable bull run.
Why do you believe its better to use the distance of ATR(20) from 200MA, instead of something like absolute mean deviation(also called average deviation) from the 200MA?The reason I ask is because ATR being just a measure of daily price changes doesn't tell you much about dispersion, only the range of the last 20 days. The avg deviation from the last 200 days will quickly tell how how the current price extreme compares to an historical context
