No doubt there's more scamming in TA than in QA. As far as quackery, I'm not so sure. As I said, they start with questionable assumptions and that's certainly a form of quackery: assuming that their mathematical models are applicable to the real world when serious scrutiny shows otherwise. They are more concerned with having pretty equations that are solvable than getting real and practical solutions to a less-than-analytical trading reality.Quote from trader#21:
![]()
![]()
![]()
Other differences:
-Among all experts/analysts/gurus, there are 80% quacks in TA compared to a manageable <25% in QA
-Among all spam/scam, it is 95% in TA while a less formidable 50% in QA.
A little research will tell you that even the MTA has scam artists as half of its core committee members.