While it's clear that the money supply has increased over time, the data should have been presented on a logarithmic scale - a linear graph makes it look like an increase from 1000 to 2000 is 1000 times worse than going from 1 to 2.
Not a big fan of M3 as it has stuff like large denomination time deposits, those are simply bank bonds disguised as deposits. If bank bonds were to be counted(and I cant find a reason for that) as money supply be quite a bit higher
Credit, I'm not sure about that, when someone gets a loan they get M1 or M2 to buy whatever they want to buy, so it would be double counting