Charles Schwab misleading (ie. straight out lying) about Covered Call trading?

Is the brokerage firm Charles Schwab misleading (ie. straight out lying) about Covered Call trading:
When establishing a covered call position, most investors sell options with a strike price that is at-the-money (ATM) or slightly out-of-the-money (OTM). If you select OTM covered calls and the stock remains flat or declines in value, the options should eventually expire worthless, and you'll get to keep the premium you received when they were sold without further obligation. If you select ATM covered calls and the stock declines in value, they too should expire worthless and the outcome is essentially the same.
I think this is total BS what that brokerage firm writes above, isn't it?
 
Read the last sentence and verify whether it's true. If stock declines then the position goes towards total loss. But the text says different.

If you mean this:

If you select ATM covered calls and the stock declines in value, they too should expire worthless and the outcome is essentially the same.

Then this is correct. If you are short call options and it expires below your strike, those options are worthless.
 
CC_ATM.png
If you mean this:
Then this is correct. If you are short call options and it expires below your strike, those options are worthless.
Oh come on man, since when!? Take a look at this (a screenshot of it is attached too below):
https://optioncreator.com/stmfgrr
 
Last edited:
Back
Top