It's a lot more nuanced than that. Rampant inflation makes debt dissappear as well, so by that logic it's in the government's best interest to keep rates at zero and encourage inflation! Thankfully we still have a few adults in government who can think more than a few days into the future.It's not actually in the government's best interest to increase rates as the cost to service debt goes up.
I agree that it's not the Fed's job to protect investors from losses, however, why promise 4 more rate hikes? Why not do as Yellen said and remain "data-dependent"? Sure, plan to hike in 3 months, but just say you'll plan to do more rate hikes if the economic data continues to look good, but each hike will be evaluated based on the data at that time. I miss Yellen.
THE only way debt disappears is if the creditor forgives 100% of the obligation. Inflation only prolongs the process. Inflated dollars are paid true, but that only continues and increases the need to borrow ever more.It's a lot more nuanced than that. Rampant inflation makes debt dissappear as well, so by that logic it's in the government's best interest to keep rates at zero and encourage inflation! Thankfully we still have a few adults in government who can think more than a few days into the future.
Of course, I was simply pointing out the absurdity on several levels of the fed keeping interest rates artificially low to to keep debt service low.THE only way debt disappears is if the creditor forgives 100% of the obligation. Inflation only prolongs the process. Inflated dollars are paid true, but that only continues and increases the need to borrow ever more.