Thanks.Yes, the obvious one is about better commissions on the short naked put. As you don't own the stock you didn't have to pay commissions to buy it yet.
Another obvious one is the dividend paid on the stock on a covered call, in case it happens. As you own the stock, dividends may apply.
The not so obvious one could be about the margin required per day for the short naked put, you might exhaust your funds it not planned properly, hence the extra considered risk. This one would depend on the broker.
I would use a short naked put over a covered call in case I wanted to buy the stock at the strike price, and in case I wasn't forced to exercise it by the option buyer, I could farm some premium.
Not so sure about dividends, are they not priced in?
Margin, is it not the same?
I don't trade those anyway, just teasing. I read a thread from 2002 where they joked about it.
I prefer verticals and their relatives.