Quote from veritas007:
Don't banks hire people with phd's in hard sciences as traders. Wouldn't a degree in statistics be better than a cfa? Who knows more about trading, a phd in finance from a top school or someone with a BA and a cfa?
I think it is the wrong question to ask. The better one is how do we know this person is worth his salt? Hint: Usually has something to do with passing at least level I.
Quote from veritas007:
What part of a cfa helps with trading?
Maybe the quantitative exercises. Maybe the knowledge of pricing options. Maybe how to read a balance sheet. Maybe knowing how to judge earnings manipulations. Maybe how to analyze a time series properly. Maybe how to manage a portfolio, which, after all, is what a trader does. Maybe how to assess risk. Maybe how to calculate NPV and make judgements when a company tells you how profitable their newest project is. Maybe how to do covered interest rate parity and arbitrage. Maybe to learn definitions of indicators, smart money and contrarian. In a word, everything in the curriculum except for ethics will make you a better financier and trader, but the entire curriculum collectively will make you a more ethical financier and trader.
Only a certain group of people can succesfully pass. I was quite happy to find people that could converse with me the way my academic advisor could who was a PhD in Economics. Since college, I'd not met many people even in my profession up until that day that could connect on the financial level I was at after level I.