CEO to Workers: I May Fire You if Obama Wins

LEAPup · Oct 12, 2012

Quote from marketsurfer:

Isn't this voter intimidation? Someone should sue that clown.

surf

No, that was the two black panther pieces of trash who stood outside of the polling station in PA daring whites to come in and vote. THAT'S REAL voter intimidation!

I FULLY understand where these CEO's are coming from with this, and I support them. Ocommunist is FORCING them to buy shit they can't afford... Well, the CEO's will lay off people to stay afloat. Pretty simple. Pretty sad we have a true communist occupying the white house. :mad:

Ricter · Oct 12, 2012

Quote from tradingjournals:

In addition Reagan had a big enemy/big reward, and high interest rates he could lower.

We'll get those high interest rates back, because inflation will return!

tradingjournals · Oct 12, 2012

Quote from Ricter:

We'll get those high interest rates back, because inflation will return!

But that is a Carteresque presidency, and not a Reaganesque presidency.

That is why one needs an Obama-nesque Presidency -- to "avoid" the pains of a Carter presidency and feel the "joy" of a Reagan presidency.

Mittens has tools, and wants the problem to adapt itself to his tools.

Obama has a problem, and wants to create tools to fix the problem.

Which one of the two do you think has a better chance to succeed at fixing the problem?

Ricter · Oct 12, 2012

Quote from tradingjournals:

But that is a Carteresque presidency, and not a Reaganesque presidency.

That is why one needs an Obama-nesque Presidency -- to "avoid" the pains of a Carter presidency and feel the "joy" of a Reagan presidency.

Mittens has tools, and wants the problem to adapt itself to his tools.

Obama has a problem, and wants to create tools to fix the problem.

Which one of the two do you think has a better chance to succeed at fixing the problem?

Not to argue, but it depends on which type of inflation, right? Cost push, demand pull, etc.... ? If memory serves, Carter had the former, Reagan the latter.

Wide Tailz · Oct 12, 2012

Quote from oldtime:

If I was president the unemployment rate would be zero. Karl Marx did it, and I'm a hell of a lot smarter than Karl Marx. (actually it wasn't Karl Marx, it was John Lennon, but same difference.)

Hitler had a similar effect

PHOENIX TRADING · Oct 12, 2012

Quote from sumfuka:

I'm hoping I would be wrong also and a dark horse candidate would appear. But we are too late for that already. Might as well position yourself in the upcoming boom bust scenario.

I'm rooting on the dark horse of the apocalypse,never let a crisis go to waist.

zdreg · Oct 13, 2012

Quote from tradingjournals:

The corporate/business world would pay for a cost only if they have to, and would take benefits away whenever they can.

That is why the business world cares about who gets elected to pass laws, and who gets elected to sign or veto laws.

in a free market economy these kind of laws would never come into existence.

Mav88 · Oct 13, 2012

Quote from tradingjournals:

In addition Reagan had a big enemy/big reward, and high interest rates he could lower.

you don't know history very well ... reagan had to start off with the second worst (behind this one) recession since WWII which had to be induced by first raising interest rates. This was the solution to stagflation.

Your posts are almost always misinformed and illogical.

logic_man · Oct 13, 2012

Quote from tradingjournals:

The corporate/business world would pay for a cost only if they have to, and would take benefits away whenever they can.

That is why the business world cares about who gets elected to pass laws, and who gets elected to sign or veto laws.

When you analyze what people do, rather than what they say, you realize that EVERYONE on the planet "would pay for a cost only if they have to, and would take away benefits whenever they can".

It's an immutable fact of existence.

Scataphagos · Oct 13, 2012

Quote from logic_man:

When you analyze what people do, rather than what they say, you realize that EVERYONE on the planet "would pay for a cost only if they have to, and would take away benefits whenever they can".

It's an immutable fact of existence.

IOW... people tend to look out for their own best interest? DUH!