Census confirms: 63 percent of ‘non-citizens’ on welfare

Last edited:
Why are non-citizens even allowed to be on welfare?

Good question. The answer: one of the worst Supreme Court decisions in history, and that is saying a lotm considering all the crap that body has vomited up over the years.

Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365 (1971), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court determined that state restrictions on welfare benefits for legal aliens but not for citizens violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court invalidated an Arizona law that required citizenship or 15 years of residence to receive welfare benefits. The 9-0 decision was written by Harry A. Blackmun.[1]

The state argued that rational basis review should apply, which would require the non-citizen to prove that the law served no conceivable legitimate state interest, or alternatively that the law was not rationally related to the government's purpose. However, the court applied the strict scrutiny standard, holding, "Aliens as a class are a prime example of a 'discrete and insular' minority for whom such heightened judicial solicitude is appropriate."[2]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graham_v._Richardson
 
Center for immigration studies is proven eugenics garbage. Try again

Brb let me put out KKK pamphlets as facts

Are you denying the 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation information which comes directly from the Census Bureau - https://www.census.gov/sipp/

90
 
Are you denying the 2014 Survey of Income and Program Participation information which comes directly from the Census Bureau - https://www.census.gov/sipp/

90

No I'm denying the selective spin CIR/FAIR put on their census "study". Anyone can make pretty graphs in Excel

https://www.cato.org/blog/fairs-fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-study-fatally-flawed

See these outfits give themselves pretty names and twist the findings of legitimate statisticians in hopes of some of that legitimacy rubbing off. It fools people who don't care to look to deep into it. Works too, as Trump has filled a ton of positions with these racist pseudo scientists.
 
Last edited:
No I'm denying the selective spin CIR/FAIR put on their census "study". Anyone can make pretty graphs in Excel

https://www.cato.org/blog/fairs-fiscal-burden-illegal-immigration-study-fatally-flawed

See these outfits give themselves pretty names and twist the findings of legitimate statisticians in hopes of some of that legitimacy rubbing off. It fools people who don't care to look to deep into it. Works too, as Trump has filled a ton of positions with these racist pseudo scientists.

So this is your defense for denying data and charts that come directly from the U.S. Census Bureau.
 
So this is your defense for denying data and charts that come directly from the U.S. Census Bureau.

you link the census....my arguments is the chart did not come from the census but was put together by CIR fudging the numbers and quoting the census as their "source". Hence the statement "anyone can make pretty charts in excel"

https://www.cis.org/Report/63-NonCi...ail&utm_term=0_7dc4c5d977-92e1453f6d-45092257'

Here's one of your "researchers"
https://americasvoice.org/blog/judge-calls-out-camarota/
 
Back
Top