CDC Makes MAJOR change on mRNA safety claims
- Thread starter misterkel
- Start date
I never abandoned the cancer increase theory. See, if you discuss another issue, it does not mean you have quit believing the previous issue.
People are capable of believing more than one thing at once.
Geez, GWB/Cuddles - that is a weak fucking argument. Can't you do better? Like, for example, discussing the actual science?
I guess not.
People are capable of believing more than one thing at once.
Geez, GWB/Cuddles - that is a weak fucking argument. Can't you do better? Like, for example, discussing the actual science?
I guess not.
Dark-Field Microscopic Analysis on the Blood of 1,006 Symptomatic Persons After Anti-COVID mRNA Injections from Pfizer/BioNtech or Moderna, published in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research.
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80
"With the hematological pictures we have presented here it is reasonable to expect reactivation of oncological disease along with blood circulation disorders."
Oncological means CANCER, just in case you didn't know.
https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/47/80
"With the hematological pictures we have presented here it is reasonable to expect reactivation of oncological disease along with blood circulation disorders."
Oncological means CANCER, just in case you didn't know.
The "International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research" is NOT a real medical journal. It is a mouthpiece for antivax groups such has the Children’s Defense Team. The publication is filled with articles and "studies" from anti-vax crackpots. The IJVTPR has been fact checked multiple times as being completely fake.
Yeah, not seeing it cuz yer ingored!
What do you think of this?
Australian Medical Professionals Society
https://npaq-8630368.hs-sites.com/c...ormation?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
"To date, Adverse Events flowing from these products are at historically unprecedented levels globally and continue to rise. And again, to date, no other drugs in human history have reported more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities, which number as follows (to 28 June 2022):
Table 1 Adverse Reactions
It is widely acknowledged that all Adverse Event reporting systems suffer from under-reporting12, an inherent challenge for passive reporting systems and their interpretation. For US VAERS reporting in respect of the COVID-19 injectables, the Under-Reporting Factor (URF) has been estimated to be between 40-49x13. If a conservative URF of 10x is applied, the above figures begin to more realistically represent the likely true effects of the Covid-19 injectables:
Table 2 Adverse events
To be clear, the TGA has received more Adverse Event reports in 2021 through June 2022 for the COVID-19 vaccines, than they have been seen for all other vaccines in the preceding 50-year period. A similar explosion in Adverse Event reports for the COVID-19 injectables has occurred in all other countries that chose to deploy them..."
What do you think of this?
Australian Medical Professionals Society
https://npaq-8630368.hs-sites.com/c...ormation?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
"To date, Adverse Events flowing from these products are at historically unprecedented levels globally and continue to rise. And again, to date, no other drugs in human history have reported more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities, which number as follows (to 28 June 2022):
Table 1 Adverse Reactions
It is widely acknowledged that all Adverse Event reporting systems suffer from under-reporting12, an inherent challenge for passive reporting systems and their interpretation. For US VAERS reporting in respect of the COVID-19 injectables, the Under-Reporting Factor (URF) has been estimated to be between 40-49x13. If a conservative URF of 10x is applied, the above figures begin to more realistically represent the likely true effects of the Covid-19 injectables:
Table 2 Adverse events
To be clear, the TGA has received more Adverse Event reports in 2021 through June 2022 for the COVID-19 vaccines, than they have been seen for all other vaccines in the preceding 50-year period. A similar explosion in Adverse Event reports for the COVID-19 injectables has occurred in all other countries that chose to deploy them..."
The Australian Medical Professional Society is a recently formed anti-vax organization which has been promoting endless nonsense. It is not a mainstream medical association.
"...The information on the website and in the IJVTPRis not intended as a diagnosis, recommended treatment, prevention, or cure for any human condition or medical procedure that may be referred to in any way. Users and readers who may be parents, guardians, caregivers, clinicians, or relatives of persons impacted by any of the morbid conditions, procedures, or protocols that may be referred to, must use their own judgment concerning specific applications. The contributing authors, editors, and persons associated in any capacity with the website and/or with the journal disclaim any liability or responsibility to any person or entity for any harm, financial loss, physical injury, or other penalty that may stem from any use or application in any context of information, conclusions, research findings, opinions, errors, or any statements found on the website or in the IJVTPR. The material presented is freely offered to all users who may take an interest in examining it, but how they may choose to apply any part of it, is the sole responsibility of the viewer/user. If material is quoted or reprinted, users are asked to give credit to the source/author and to conform to the non-commercial, no derivatives, requirements of the Creative Commons License4.0NCND..."
Can you imagine if all medical specialists gave this disclaimer on everything they did? There would be no doctors left in the world.
But here is a line in this "report" that took me aback, on page 23.
"The images presented here are accompanied by some of the standard information supplied by the SEM equipment and its accompanying software(e.g., acquisition parameters such as voltage, magnification, type of detector,and probe current).*
*For qualified individuals, more information can be obtained by writing directly to the corresponding author."
REALLY! So everything is public, except what you deem to be the secret sauce which led you to your conclusions. What are qualified individuals?
Bottom line, the study was a waste of time.
Can you imagine if all medical specialists gave this disclaimer on everything they did? There would be no doctors left in the world.
But here is a line in this "report" that took me aback, on page 23.
"The images presented here are accompanied by some of the standard information supplied by the SEM equipment and its accompanying software(e.g., acquisition parameters such as voltage, magnification, type of detector,and probe current).*
*For qualified individuals, more information can be obtained by writing directly to the corresponding author."
REALLY! So everything is public, except what you deem to be the secret sauce which led you to your conclusions. What are qualified individuals?
Bottom line, the study was a waste of time.