Quote from ddouglas:
My point exactly - and the terminology used in the posts never gives the impression that this changed.
Apparently it is understood now.
Actually it's been understood now for quite some time. Again, you'd know this if you spent some time reading the thread, spesifically my reply to jerkstore on page 2.
Why consider anything other than the ES? Because not everyone has the same criteria as you do when it comes to choosing a contract. That's a starter.Quote from ddouglas:
The question now is: if you want to trade S&P500 futures-options, why consider anything other than the ES? It's one of the most liquid contracts in the world. SP options are much less liquid, and I believe they only trade electronically in the off-hours (pit-only during the regular session, if I'm not mistaken).
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/sandp-500_contractSpecs_options.html
This may be why you're not getting any quotes (though I've never bothered with the SP contract, & know little about its specifics).
ES options are much more liquid, and trade electronically virtually round-the-clock.
http://www.cmegroup.com/trading/equity-index/us-index/e-mini-sandp500_contractSpecs_options.html