I listened to the news "reporter" fake anchorman sitting behind a fake desk and a fake background in the Rumble video that you linked.
The fake reporter did make the claim that the Pope made some kind of claim that Jesus was Satan...but didn't elaborate...didn't point to sources (except a headline from NewsPunch in the background), didn't quote from NewsPunch, didn't give any context...didn't say anything more about the matter except for the annunciation that this is what the Pope said.
I wanted context but found that NewsPunch hasn't been a news source for about five years or so, and is not called PeoplesVoice or something.
So am i supposed to go searching for five year old archives under PeoplesVoice to find a NewsPunch article that explains how the Pope said Jesus is Satan?
Maybe you should do that before repeating propaganda here as if it was fact, just because a fake news reporter said so?
Re: One World Religion
First, its obvious you are playing fast and loose with words if you think that means "eradicate christianity", and report it as such. That's literally your own interpretation of what the Pope intends to do.
Second, christianity is in fact a world religion, among several other world religions. As such, it grounds and anchors your soul here to the world, and keeps it here as long as you adhere to any of the faith brands under the world religiion umbrella. This is to mean that christianity, as is, with the Catholic church as it's parent, and 20,000 children birthed from that parent, is equally effective at keeping souls here, in this world, as any other brand of faith, especially any of the Abrahamic faiths.
So the Pope isn't doing or intending anything that doesn't already exist. The intent, apparently, is to reduce fighting amongst the various faith brands. Exactly how i don't know, but reducing arrogance could be a start.
You, perhaps as yet another expression of cognitive dissonance, are in favor of a one world religion. If that religion was your particular brand, i'm sure you'd be happy, and could consider that a success in terms of the "Great Commission", which is to make Jesus' brand of understanding a world wide phenomenon, if not the only understanding standing at the end of the world.
You don't like a one world religion if it must be shared with other brands of understanding.
But because none of them really understand, they are all equally effective in maintaining the status quo, where you die, are reborn, die, are reborn...endlessly into this world.
Again, if all the world religions lead back here, to this world, then there is defacto a one world religion already. That is, there is not more than one agenda which binds all these religions together. There are 1000 paths back here. So it doesn't really matter which one you pick.
My motive for pointing this out is because what you are doing is ethically low, so low that it could even be considered psychological warfare of the cheapest kind, and what history shows to be among the bloodiest kind.