Cathie Wood is the face of the Nasdaq implosion
- Thread starter Innervoice
- Start date
She is like a modern day's Abby Joseph Cohen. Veterans will remember... ;-)
I do. The sad thing is that I do NOT remember any successful female HF manager. I am not saying there isn't any, they are just not memorable.
One feministic magazine I read for kicks, goes on a lot about how women are superior to men when it comes to investing etc. And then there are the white-knighting simps who will re-publish over and over stats from surveys in this magazine stating that it's not just a theory, but a fact that females are superior to males in this environment. And of course, this is not allowed to be refuted.
And yet, I hear nothing about the fact that any survey/test showing the opposite results, are prohibited from being discussed, because THEN that would be sexist.
That said, I guess I can think of one case to show how terrible men are as investors. Pelosi does 100x over Warren Buffet. Ironically, The Motley Fool wrote a book titled "Warren Buffett invests like a girl, and so should you."
Imagine the outrage had you changed 'girl' to 'man' in that title...
And yet, I hear nothing about the fact that any survey/test showing the opposite results, are prohibited from being discussed, because THEN that would be sexist.
That said, I guess I can think of one case to show how terrible men are as investors. Pelosi does 100x over Warren Buffet. Ironically, The Motley Fool wrote a book titled "Warren Buffett invests like a girl, and so should you."
Imagine the outrage had you changed 'girl' to 'man' in that title...
She was the talk of the world for awhile.
Seriously, man or woman, doesn't matter. I'll throw out Cramer, or at least half the other tools they throw out on the various financial news channels.
One feministic magazine I read for kicks, goes on a lot about how women are superior to men when it comes to investing etc. And then there are the white-knighting simps who will re-publish over and over stats from surveys in this magazine stating that it's not just a theory, but a fact that females are superior to males in this environment. And of course, this is not allowed to be refuted.
And yet, I hear nothing about the fact that any survey/test showing the opposite results, are prohibited from being discussed, because THEN that would be sexist.
That said, I guess I can think of one case to show how terrible men are as investors. Pelosi does 100x over Warren Buffet. Ironically, The Motley Fool wrote a book titled "Warren Buffett invests like a girl, and so should you."
Imagine the outrage had you changed 'girl' to 'man' in that title...
In any field where there are far more males then females, there won't be many obvious female successes. The research out there suggests on the whole men tend to have far more huge successes and far more spectacular failures. Doesn't mean there won't be some big female successes, but perhaps most of those people aren't going to be drawn to trading or maybe even fund management.
Last edited:
Oh gawd, talk about a broken clock. How can you say the same thing for the last 30 years? Bull, bull, bull, bull...even to this day.
The Farce is strong with that one.
If investors want their money back, yes.