Quote from cdcaveman:
i got this book..
Inside Volatility Arbitrage : The Secrets of Skewness
read some of it.. not much to read... its all Math.. its a book of no practical use to me... if you haven't taken and become proficient in calculus.. it will be completely worthless... alot of these books just pretty much say.. you can price it like this .... or you can price it like this...... its like just a containerization of the math and really nothing else... it doesn't say SHIT past that.. annoying as hell... i'm sure at some point after a few more math classes some of this stuff will make intuitive sense to me .. and i'll find more use for it..
I naturally question everything so I do question the math thing. Like you I never took calculus and we don't have community colleges and or an adult education culture of any sort here. I thought of hiring a college kid or international school teacher to teach me calculus but held back.
My thoughts are;
1) if calculus is the root of successful options trading, then those who are great at this would make a killing all the time. This does not happen.
2) the math wizards will always have the edge over me.
3) making money in options is something quite separate from the ability to understand esoteric concepts. Notice people like Natenberg, McMillian, Sinclair et al do not see the need to baffle you with bullshit in their books. Just clear simple explanations of how to trade stuff like volatility, ie. what really matter in practical terms.
Bottom line is options pricing ie the market does not adhere to models. Yes I do look at the Greeks every day, but I have zero expectation that my spreads will price as per the models, because volatility is constantly changing and the models assume fixed volatility. Hell I have spreads with +2 theta and I never get that on anything remotely close to a steady rate. Nothing happens for 3 days then the underlying lurches and I make 6 in 1 day.
So I am leaning towards focusing more on practical aspects of trading, eg what is historical IV, what percentile is current IV in that data set given that volatility is mean reverting in the long term. How is the skew now compared to typically?
For this stuff you don't need the high level math, just a great grasp of numbers and statistics, and I'm pretty comfortable in that terrain.
Sorry for the essay in your thread, just want to share my thoughts.