I'll go with it. Let's say that out of 65,000 members, only 6,500 (10%) are potential subscribers. To get the desired 150 subscribers to your system, you only need 2.3% of these potential subscribers, which doesn't seem like a big stretch, if your system is the top-performing C2 system.
Capital Available for Traders
- Thread starter mickson
- Start date
- Status
I'll go with it. Let's say that out of 65,000 members, only 6,500 (10%) are potential subscribers. To get the desired 150 subscribers to your system, you only need 2.3% of these potential subscribers, which doesn't seem like a big stretch, if your system is the top-performing C2 system.
Just out of curiosity, I might try to find that system over the weekend. Anyway, running the numbers backward:
If the system is 3 years (40 months, for easier math) old and charges $300 per month it only needs about 42 subscribers to make half million in fees. That is easily doable with only 5000 active members...
Tough year? The markets were up 10%. Only way you could lose like this is if you have no idea what you are doing.
I submitted my track records to a few firms looking to employ traders.
I had two places accept the records and say lets go.
Drum Roll.....
Then I asked if they can employ foreigners and they said no.....
The End.
I had two places accept the records and say lets go.
Drum Roll.....
Then I asked if they can employ foreigners and they said no.....
The End.
LOL
Apart from the complete lack of class behind this comment, you clearly don't understand that strategies can be uncorrelated to equity benchmarks. (I'm assuming you are referring to equities when you refer to "markets"?)
Plenty of strategies exhibit poor performance against equity benchmarks over one year horizons and yet outperform equities dramatically over a 5 year horizon.
But you obviously know this right? I mean, since you are intimating that you what you are doing...
- Status