Canadian Prime Minister Harper: "Reckless U.S. consumers caused recession"

[Vespasian]

DON'T F#CK WITH CANADA THEY HAVE SNOWBALLS AND THEY ARE NOT AFRAID TO USE THEM.

 

[Trader666]

Do your parents know you're on the computer again?

Quote from eagle:

Listen super m____ [ to be completed by you ], I'm not detail-oriented as you to compare thing words by words, but I compare the idea as a whole. You seemed to be at the side of pointing the fault to US consumers, right? Or unless I misunderstood your idea. Harper as well, but he was just promoting his party's values.

Honestly, I don't really understand your phrase about humping but Jack Hershey should understand very well what it means when you go hump his leg.

 

[eagle]

Yep, the reason I mention him because Jack is a good "friend" of Trader666.

Quote from Z.O.G.:

Did somebody say "JACK HERSHEY"?

 

[Trader666]

No, you're trying change the subject because you can't explain how "American consumers were at the center of the storm" equates to "Harper blamed US consumers for nothing" as you said it does.

But I do think you need a guru like Jack Hershey, now that you brought him up.

Quote from eagle:

Yep, the reason I mention him because Jack is a good "friend" of Trader666.

 

[eagle]

No, I don't change the subject. I think you got it as I already answered your question in the previous post that you share the same idea as Harper but for different purpose.

Quote from Trader666:

No, you're trying change the subject because you can't explain how "American consumers were at the center of the storm" equates to "Harper blamed US consumers for nothing" as you said it does.

But I do think you need a guru like Jack Hershey, now that you brought him up.

 

[Trader666]

If you call that an answer it explains a lot... why you did so poorly in school and why you still lack critical thinking skills.

As I told you (before you tried to steal the line from me, even though you claim you don't understand it) go hump someone else's leg.

Quote from eagle:

No, I don't change the subject. I think you got it as I already answered your question in the previous post that you share the same idea as Harper but for different purpose.

 

[eagle]

You're just telling us your own story indeed.

Now my question is, did you share the same idea as Harper or not? If no, then I have nothing to say and sorry for my misunderstanding. If yes, then I already answered to your question and it's up to you to understand it correctly.

Quote from Trader666:

If you call that an answer it explains a lot... why you did so poorly in school and why you still lack critical thinking skills.

 

[Trader666]

What part of this don't you understand?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=2349687#post2349687

I said NOTHING about Harper's political motives for saying it. Go argue that with someone else who wants to discuss it. Which is what I meant by telling you to hump someone else's leg.

Quote from eagle:

You're just telling us your own story indeed.

Now my question is, did you share the same idea as Harper or not? If no, then I have nothing to say and sorry for my misunderstanding. If yes, then I already answered to your question and it's up to you to understand it correctly.

 

[Ivanovich]

Quote from eagle:

Every moron think that others are moron.

 

[Kassz007]

Quote from eagle:

The reason behind is all about eventual election or promoting the Conservative Party which he is currently the big boss. If you read the document, it mentioned that the unconservative idea had lead to the problem that we are facing right now. In other words, "vote for Conservative is safe because our values sound", while "vote for the Liberal is unsafe" as you can see right now. In brief, the target was not US consumers nor Bush/Obama administration but the real target was the Liberal Party.

You are exactly correct. The American consumer was caught in the crossfire but Harper's real intent there was to bash the Liberal's and prop up the Conservatives.