Quote from Gabfly1:
I think Harper did well. He was sufficiently prime ministerial in his demeanor. Layton held his own and did quite well also. I wish Ignatieff focused more on Harper's reliance on high-end, supply-side trickle-down, which is a bankrupt economic "theory" for the simple reason that tax cuts do not pay for themselves. (How many jobs did Bush create during his 8 years in office using his magic bean supply-side?) Also, I wish he also addressed the Conservatives' Republican-style personal attack ads. In this way, with the Republican-style economics and Republican-style personal attack ads, Ignatieff could have painted Harper as the George W. Bush of Canadian politics.
Regardless of the polls, I will vote for Mr. Ignatieff because his views are the most closely aligned with my own.
Come on now, attack ads are another MOOT point. All politicians use attack ads, not just Harper. You should hear some of the Iggy radio ads running in my area right now. This is the reason the leaders don't go there - because they're all guilty.
The leaders don't go after the Conservatives for being Republican style because they and the rest of Canada knows there are vast differences between the Conservative Party in Canada and the Republican Party in the USA. Any slander in this direction would only make the other parties look foolish.
In my opinion, if Iggy wants to make some ground, he needs to focus more on communicating the Liberal agenda to Canadians instead of simply putting down the Conservative agenda. I know of many areas where the Liberals disagree with the Conservatives, but know little of what the Liberals would do differently. Aside from reviewing the figher jet purchase, giving free money to anyone who wants to go to university, and raising taxes, I'm not sure what the Liberals are planning to do.