My point is not to lose context.
If you want to make a stand regarding this issue, fine. I respect your conviction.
If you want to make a stand regarding this issue, fine. I respect your conviction.
Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:
Watch the video of the Canadian Sportsman clubbing baby seals to death.....
http://www.ifilm.com/ifilmdetail/2667866?htv=12
I'm sure many ET members own dogs, imagine someone clubbing puppies to death this way.....
Quote from ARogueTrader:
Do I care if someone has sex with an animal?
No.
Do I think it is twisted?
Yes.
Do I think the government should prevent people from doing it in the privacy of their own home?
No.
Quote from ARogueTrader:
People have the freedom to kill and eat animals, but not have sex with them?
People can own pets and keep them on leashes, beat them, or keep them cooped up in cages, basements, closets but not have sex with them?
People can stick their pets in a cage for weeks at a boarding facility where they suffer loneliness, fear and confinement while the owner travels but they can't have sex with them?
This is a value judgment. I think it is twisted that people want to have sex with an animal, but I think a lot of what people do that is harmful to other people and/or animals is twisted.
That doesn't mean that I think it should be made illegal by the government.
Now, if we as a society and government decide to grant all animals the same rights as humans across the board, then I would support that. But a meat-eating, gun toting, duck hunting, deer killing, fur coat wearing, etc. society will never give up the right to kill animals for sport, fashion, or pleasure.
So if some deviant wants to have sex with an animal, why is it really different?
Quote from Rearden Metal:
More hypocricy from LoZZZer AKA ARogueTrader:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...ght=someone+has+sex+with+an+animal#post421595
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showt...78&perpage=6&highlight=internal&pagenumber=11