Can you say braindead flaming moonbats?

Nice to see the resident troll is consistent in his hypocrisy:

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

Anyone who doubts that the far right is insane should listen to the mad ravings of Michael Savage...

A menagerie of kooks, all of them...

Not too long ago, he said this:

Quote from ZZZzzzzzzz:

I am not a great fan of Michael Savage, but I am with him on this one.

The outsourcing of our jobs, technology, and culture are gradually eating away at what made America great.

Now we want to outsource security to an Arab nation?
That's our troll, you always know he's going to remind us all every now and then that he is still on a downward spiral...
 
I see some people are still stupid enought to think that our leaders serve OUR country.

Pick your poison, either way you're gonna end up fighing wars for Israel. Send your kids now.

obama_aipac248_ap.jpg


hillary_aipac_dinner_nyc_020107.jpg
 
There is more than just disagreement in this thread and others like it. There is contempt. The exchanges are often bitter. Wasn't Bush hailed as the conciliator when he first took office? Wasn't he the guy who was going to reach out and bring the parties together for the common good? Isn't that what his supporters were claiming in the early days? In anyone's memory here, has there ever been a greater polarity across the board than there is now, under the current administration? If Bush had expressly wanted to drive a divisive stake through the heart of the country, could he possibly have done a better job than he has already done?
 
Quote from maxpi:

...The world is a slightly better place for my efforts, it's safer, kinder, it has more help for the friendless and hopeless and the ordinary folk too, it has a little more tolerance and it has a little more understanding and love than it did before......

This, from the person that said the following just a few weeks ago:

"On the other hand, the professor was likely a limp-wristed, faggot loving, anti-gun, get-whitey's-money-advocate, corrupting the hearts and minds of the youth of America so, yeah the shooter got him first I guess... the day wasn't entirely wasted..."

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1793378#post1793378
 
I can feel the love macal...

Maxipads idea of a "kinder, gentler America."



Quote from macal425:

This, from the person that said the following just a few weeks ago:

"On the other hand, the professor was likely a limp-wristed, faggot loving, anti-gun, get-whitey's-money-advocate, corrupting the hearts and minds of the youth of America so, yeah the shooter got him first I guess... the day wasn't entirely wasted..."

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/showthread.php?s=&postid=1793378#post1793378
 
Quote from Thunderdog:

There is more than just disagreement in this thread and others like it. There is contempt. The exchanges are often bitter. Wasn't Bush hailed as the conciliator when he first took office? Wasn't he the guy who was going to reach out and bring the parties together for the common good? Isn't that what his supporters were claiming in the early days? In anyone's memory here, has there ever been a greater polarity across the board than there is now, under the current administration? If Bush had expressly wanted to drive a divisive stake through the heart of the country, could he possibly have done a better job than he has already done?

Yes, but in fairness Bush did try this and was rebuffed by democrats. Bush went along with Kennedy's education bill, even though republicans hated it. He had the Kennedys to the White House for some JFK thing. He did make an effort and all he got in return was bitter personal attacks and hostility. Of course, after Iraq went bad, there was no hope of ever working with the dems. They had to deliver raw meat to their moonbat fringe.
 
Poor Bush, a victim of the democrats.

I would not expect any rational person would actually think this way...but we are talking about crazed right wingers looking to offload Bush's screw-ups onto someone else...

Quote from AAAintheBeltway:

Yes, but in fairness Bush did try this and was rebuffed by democrats. Bush went along with Kennedy's education bill, even though republicans hated it. He had the Kennedys to the White House for some JFK thing. He did make an effort and all he got in return was bitter personal attacks and hostility. Of course, after Iraq went bad, there was no hope of ever working with the dems. They had to deliver raw meat to their moonbat fringe.
 
Quote from Pondracer:

You are not conservative. And while you may vote Republican its doubtful that you have much understanding of the platform.

What you are is very similar to the Taliban. I find an amazing and somewhat scary resemblance between you and your type and Muslim extremists. There is the preaching of hate, of course, but also many of the ugly subtleties that the Taliban, Al Quaida and the rest embrace.

I have friends who are real Republicans, who understand conservative principals. I have respect for them, though we do not agree on policy. Real discussions of values, differences and choices are really only satisfying - and more importantly productive - when both sides are able to effectively engage in intelligent conversations.

But really its just intellectual laziness. Its easier to spew crap then to have to think. Thats why this country is where it is today.

Excellent points regarding the difference between true principled conservatives and the TGregg type.
 
Quote from hapaboy:

Nice to see the resident troll is consistent in his hypocrisy:

Not too long ago, he said this:

Nice job hap. Notice that the Idiot Troll posted after this revelation but couldn't answer your charge (because you posted the proof).

ZZZzzzenu's words are worthless.
 
Back
Top