Can you imagine the selfishness of these people?

It appeals to the average consoomer who would respond to this by saying something along the lines of "abortion good because I would not be able to consoooom fleetwood mac otherwise".

When you frame things such that you look at through the lens of a consumption culture it becomes obvious why people say this shit.
 
gaussian said:
It appeals to the average consoomer who would respond to this by saying something along the lines of "abortion good because I would not be able to consoooom fleetwood mac otherwise".

When you frame things such that you look at through the lens of a consumption culture it becomes obvious why people say this shit.
More...

Yeap, and doesnt the opposite hold true. If Stevie Nicks' mother had aborted her, there would have never been a Fleetwood Mac.

Not that I care one way or the other, Fleetwood Mac has never been one of my favorite bands.
 
Fleetwood Mac sucks and Stevie Nicks is the main reason for that. She should of had the child and saved all of us from the horror of their music.
 
wildchild said:
So this lady's argument for abortion is that if she hadnt gotten one, she wouldnt have been able to be in a band? WTF? Where does that kind of ignorant logic lead us?

The ends justice the means in the left-wingers mind.

Stevie Nicks says that if she had not gotten an abortion, she's 'pretty sure there would have been no Fleetwood Mac'
https://www.yahoo.com/news/stevie-nicks-says-she-had-163018337.html
More...

If a young woman want a career and a decent life not an unwanted pregnancy that's a highly rational decision. The ignorant logic is again coming from you ( no surprise ); maybe try a little harder to make good decisions in your own life not inflict yourself and your warped sensibilities in a stranger's life. Thank god we have laws that tell idiots like you to fuck off and mind your own business.
 
gaussian said:
It appeals to the average consoomer who would respond to this by saying something along the lines of "abortion good because I would not be able to consoooom fleetwood mac otherwise".

When you frame things such that you look at through the lens of a consumption culture it becomes obvious why people say this shit.
More...

If you ever meet a woman with a mind of her own, she'll either set you straight or quickly leave you once you start voicing your opinion on these topics. A rational progressive person recognizes the value of early term abortions in the case of unwanted pregnancies. It seems to go way over the heads of some dumb ass men.
 
FortuneTeller said:
Fleetwood Mac sucks and Stevie Nicks is the main reason for that. She should of had the child and saved all of us from the horror of their music.
More...

No surprise you are again criticizing a successful career woman. Seems to be one of your deep hang ups. At one point I believe they had the best selling record of all time. She then launched a highly successful solo career as well.
 
Nine_Ender said:
If you ever meet a woman with a mind of her own, she'll either set you straight or quickly leave you once you start voicing your opinion on these topics. A rational progressive person recognizes the value of early term abortions in the case of unwanted pregnancies. It seems to go way over the heads of some dumb ass men.
More...

Ah yes one of my favorite arguments. "You're not a woman so you can't say anything". To be honest it's a fantastic way to beat weak willed opponents into submission. The problem is it optimizes for the argument ending quickly so you can get back to being a predator...I mean male feminist.

Considering abortion was first pushed by a eugenicist and abortion clinics are conveniently set up near black neighborhoods one has to wonder if abortion serves any other purpose than to eliminate "bad genetics" (as determined by the far left racists pushing as far as late term abortion) from the pool. Given the data, I'd say it's possible. Of course, you'll spout some bullshit about "my body my choice" and "freedom to have an abortion" but birth control is 99.9% effective when used correctly and if you can't accept the outcome of a 0.1% or less chance of having a child perhaps you shouldn't have sex.

But being a Canadian predator...I mean feminist... not having sex is something you're probably fairly good at. One day you'll convince a woman to have sex with you. You'll have to work on that weak chin and predatory behavior though!
 
Last edited:
gaussian said:
Ah yes one of my favorite arguments. "You're not a woman so you can't say anything". To be honest it's a fantastic way to beat weak willed opponents into submission. The problem is it optimizes for the argument ending quickly so you can get back to being a predator...I mean male feminist.

Considering abortion was first pushed by a eugenicist and abortion clinics are conveniently set up near black neighborhoods one has to wonder if abortion serves any other purpose than to eliminate "bad genetics" (as determined by the far left racists pushing as far as late term abortion) from the pool. Given the data, I'd say it's possible. Of course, you'll spout some bullshit about "my body my choice" and "freedom to have an abortion" but birth control is 99.9% effective when used correctly and if you can't accept the outcome of a 0.1% or less chance of having a child perhaps you shouldn't have sex.

But being a Canadian predator...I mean feminist... not having sex is something you're probably fairly good at. One day you'll convince a woman to have sex with you. You'll have to work on that weak chin and predatory behavior though!
More...

Your posts clearly highlight you have very little life experience. In 20-30 years you may realize just how stupid in nature you really are now ( if you can ). Birth control is not 99.9% effective, life happens and people are not required to deal with adverse events in their life according to your personal feelings. People will not stop having sex either for superficial reasons that some religious people like to voice ( but frequently didn't even follow themselves ). In fact, teenage pregnancies are not rare in the US bible belt. I'm 100% for free choice for women. The predator in this equation is you; god help any woman or daughter that runs against your current personal code.

Based on your posts, I would say it's highly unlikely you've ever been in a serious relationship and that the first one will last no more then 2 years if you don't seriously change your ideas on life.
 
Last edited:
Nine_Ender said:
Your posts clearly highlight you have very little life experience. In 20-30 years you may realize just how stupid in nature you really are now ( if you can ). Birth control is not 99.9% effective, life happens and people are not required to deal with adverse events in their life according to your personal feelings. People will not stop having sex either for superficial reasons that some religious people like to voice ( but frequently didn't even follow themselves ). In fact, teenage pregnancies are not rare in the US bible belt. I'm 100% for free choice for women. The predator in this equation is you; god help any woman or daughter that runs against your current personal code.

Based on your posts, I would say it's highly unlikely you've ever been in a serious relationship and that the first one will last no more then 2 years if you don't seriously change your ideas on life.
More...

I'm sorry but lmao you remind me of the white knight neckbeard that claims to be pro-everything but is actually a sad incel. I mean that in the you literally store piss bottles and soyface your way through life. You see I'm one of the libertarians that believe that fundamentally abortion violates the NAP. I have very little to say about abortion in the first 5 weeks, but after that it violates the NAP and is ethically and morally reprehensible. Supporting it after that is a position of weakness. Onto my next point...

Grow a pair and stand up for yourself. You're weak and you can tell it in the way you write. Birth control is in fact 99.9% effective, in fact the depo shot has several 9s after the first one. Something that approximates 1 in 1000. You've obvious not done your research. You'd probably know this if you've ever been with a woman on the shot.

"In 20-30 years" is galaxy brain for a guy who sounds like a 16 year old whose upset his prom date left him for chad. Why won't they pick you as a mating partner? Perhaps the fact that you're so "pro women" it gives off a sense of being disingenuous - almost like a predator wearing camouflage to get in their pants. As it turns out women are more interested in men who are different than them, rather than the ones who agree with them to the point of groveling.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top