What I don't like is racist blanket statements.
For example. the last person I banned from this forum for racial hatred said the following statement repeatedly over and over again:
"The vast majority of white-collar crimes in the U.S. are committed by Jews."
I asked him repeatedly to back up that statement with a single credible and verifiable source. He could not do that, so I banned him with the caveat that if he could find a credible statistic source to back up his statement, I would let him back. Of course, he has been unable to produce anything whatsoever in the past year or two since he's been gone.
The other irritating thing he did was post new threads containing his exact same anti-Semitic opinion daily. Again, that's not necessary. It's just annoying.
So...
In summary, this is the framework we are working with here:
There are other conditions and situations that can get a person banned, but violating the three above will guarantee that a person gets the boot swiftly and without warning.
- Don't make blanket statements that can neither be verified or even believed by pretty much anyone.
- Don't repeat yourself frequently with multiple new threads essentially expressing the exact same racist opinion. We heard you the first 10 times.
- Don't make your post history here look like you are only here to talk about one racist subject. People on soapboxes, regardless of the subject matter, are extremely irritating and disruptive.
Yet asiaprop is back. Corky5 makes the same assertions w.r.t. Blacks yet he gets a pass.
