Can We Defend The Entire World? Should We?
- Thread starter AAAintheBeltway
- Start date
It neither proves or disproves a claim that is not proved or disproved.
The claim was from a self righteous winger...hubristic, and in denial of the moral wrongs by the US in the middle east.
Not everyone thinks America has the moral fiber it once had...
The war in Iraq was not a war of necessity, it was not a moral war in the opinion of other civilized societies...
Mahatma Gandhi, 1931
I think it would be a good idea.
Mahatma Gandhi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization.
Please with the stop with name calling.
No, if I have wrongly called people names, it doesn't make your name calling right. That is the reasoning of a 5 year old.
Of course if your morality is all relativistic, then you have no principles of right and wrong that are immutable.
The claim was from a self righteous winger...hubristic, and in denial of the moral wrongs by the US in the middle east.
Not everyone thinks America has the moral fiber it once had...
The war in Iraq was not a war of necessity, it was not a moral war in the opinion of other civilized societies...
Mahatma Gandhi, 1931
I think it would be a good idea.
Mahatma Gandhi, when asked what he thought of Western civilization.
Please with the stop with name calling.
No, if I have wrongly called people names, it doesn't make your name calling right. That is the reasoning of a 5 year old.
Of course if your morality is all relativistic, then you have no principles of right and wrong that are immutable.
Yet you proclaimed it as false anyway.
says the self righteous left winger...
What bull shit.
Me included, but we still have more than most.
Another change of subject, as expected. But in any case it's a war that continues under Obama.
Which translates to: Only I the great ZZZzzzz/Optional can engage in name calling. Isn't "right winger" name calling, dopey?
You know if I didn't already know what a two faced lying POS lard ass drunken troll your are statements like that would ALMOST make you look intellectual. But they don't. But go ahead and continue your facade of master debater.
Yet you proclaimed it as false anyway.
It is false. Just ask the people in other countries if it was true.
That is the point...
says the self righteous left winger...
What bull shit.
Ad hominem.
Even if I used an ad hominem, that doesn't make your ad hominem not a fallacy.
(This is too easy)
Me included, but we still have more than most.
Oh the "We have more than most" argument.
Another change of subject, as expected. But in any case it's a war that continues under Obama.
The war does continue with Obama, which is why the hard left feels that Obama is wrong to stay in Iraq.
So much for the "Obama is a leftist nonsense."
A leftist would have pulled out of Iraq ASAP...and so would a Libertarian following the lead of Ron Paul.
Which translates to: Only I the great ZZZzzzz/Optional can engage in name calling. Isn't "right winger" name calling, dopey?
Interesting watching you escalate. Predictable.
You know if I didn't already know what a two faced lying POS lard ass drunken troll your are statements like that would ALMOST make you look intellectual. But they don't. But go ahead and continue your facade of master debater. Unbeknown to you anyone who has been here more than week knows better.
Oh, now we have the "sober" minded screaming into the keyboard. You know, you are not going to recover from the exposing of you as a hypocrite this way, right?
You have anything else? Anything at all?
You have anything else? Anything at all? This is your best shot?