Quote from deaddog:
50% is not bad if you cut losses and let winners run.
Like I said nothing works all the time, and there is more to trading that just buying or selling a MA cross. Risk and Money management also factor into the equation.
Itâs kind of simple. If you have an equal number of winners and losers. You make more with the winners than you lose with the losers. Shouldnât you make be making more money than you lose.Quote from Rationalize:
50% - costs.
Why is it assumed that cutting your losses and letting winners run works?
Do you think this works for casino games too?
Really?

If the instrument you are trading does not move as you expect it, get out immediate. It is better to exit early and reenter once proven right then to hold on and pray. This was the best tip I got from reading the Phantom of the Pits Quote from swingtrader123:
Here is the holy grailIf the instrument you are trading does not move as you expect it, get out immediate. It is better to exit early and reenter once proven right then to hold on and pray. This was the best tip I got from reading the Phantom of the Pits
by Art Simpson.
Quote from Rationalize:
You might find that the sum of the large number of small losers overwhelms the sum small of the small number of large winners.
Pretty much any backtest of a moving average based strategy will show this same result.
Quote from vk60546:
one of the posters here posted that they gave their family member a holy grail and they still failed.
Now, after reading that thread, I've found that some of the rules were:
1. Don't trade stocks that have an avg. daily volume of 1million
2. Price must be over $10
but I'm not sure about the other rules.
Also, I'm looking for interday trading strategy, since I can't be trading during the market hours.
Thanks to all. Sorry for such immodest request.