Can somebody please educate me on where US Debt comes from?

That's not correct... In general, kings routinely enjoyed the benefits offered by fractional reserve banking and only had issues with it when the bankers refused to cooperate (e.g. Edward I of England and the Ricciardi of Lucca in the 13th century). The point is that, if you're the king, fractional reserve banking is fine. If you're a commoner, it could be treason.

Finally, yes, the quote is allegedly attributed to Josiah Stamp. However, there is no record of him ever saying anything of the sort.
Martinghoul you are a wise and very knowledgable trader and an expert in sovereing bonds
and interest rate products and what you say is true. I would hate arguing with you.
In the end living under a philosopher king or philospher banker is only as good as the philosopher.
 
with the corresponding longest lifespans, lowest infant mortality, highest education levels...
Not sure about the third item, but I'm quite sure that the first two are not correct, and probably the third isn't either. But this in no way invalidates your point.
 
Martinghoul you are a wise and very knowledgable trader and an expert in sovereing bonds
and interest rate products and what you say is true. I would hate arguing with you.
In the end living under a philosopher king or philospher banker is only as good as the philosopher.
Thank you for the compliment... And yes, indeed, the problem is that money and debt doesn't ever exist in a vacuum. It's almost always more about the politics than economics.
 
and it's just all printed by the Fed
I want to make a small, but important point here. Panthers posted is correct,i.e., 'money is created out of debt', It is very important to recognize that this is, to an extent determined later by economic conditions, a reversible process. When actual printing occurs the money created is not tied to debt, and the process is irreversible. Even economists who know better use the term 'printing' to describe the reversible process in which the Fed facilitates expansion of the money supply by buying bonds using money it has just created 'out of thin air'. (The money has to get into circulation in the economy, before it can have an inflationary effect. so if it just sits in banks reserve accounts as unused excess reserves it won't be inflationary.) This kind of 'money printing' is very different from irreversible printing of money that is not tied to debt. For example, what Zimbabwe did was actual irreversible printing of money not tied to debt, and then Zimbabwe used, or tried to use, that money to pay on debt. That kind of thing, once it is discovered, leads to hyperinflation.

The Fed can both expand and contract the money supply according to macroeconomic conditions and the inflation rate. The Fed works closely with the U.S. Treasury, but is required to buy its bonds on the secondary market so the price discovery mechanism can work. The Fed controls the inflation rate via manipulation of the money supply indirectly by controlling interest rates. The Fed usually does this mainly via control of the rates that banks pay to borrow money. If a bank has to pay more for the money they borrow, then quite naturally they will have to raise the rates they charge their customers. Briefly, during Paul Volcker's tenure as Fed chairman, following a recommendation of Milton Friedman, the Fed experimented with trying to control the inflation rate by direct regulation of the money supply. It did not work as well as anticipated, and the Fed returned to indirect control of inflation via interest rates.
 
Last edited:
You might be confusing two things here, there might be no connection.
I assume you were talking about US here. Infant mortality rate is one of the highest in OECD countries, education levels are high but not the highest, US ranks 31st in life expectancy which isn't that great. Of course you can say you were comparing to Somalia and Pakistan...
Not confused at all. The entire world uses a fractional reserve currency system. Since switching to a fractional reserve system, the world has experienced unprecedented growth in pretty much any quality of life metric you care to measure. It appears that some here see that as bad and want to return to a system where we tie our currency to an entirely arbitrary mineral that we extract from the earth? Or perhaps you all want to go back to a barter based economy? If fractional reserve=bad then what equals good?
To paraphrase Churchill's take on democracy, fractional reserve is the worst form of currency except all those other forms that have been tried from time to time.
 
Its not worth my time. I've had this exact same debate a million times before. Sure, lots of benefits to fractional reserve banking during periods of massive capital investment. Not to offshore so we can finance consumer and Government debt, so we can all drown in it. Comprehende?
Translation, I don't have a good answer for you so I just tell you it's "not worth my time". Then throw in a "comprende" in there as a good final insult, because that's the way Achilles28 rolls.
Every country in the world uses a fractional reserve program, so criticizing such a system as being somehow responsible for offshoring is rather nonsensical. Again I ask you what you think everyone in the world should switch to and why that will make life better overall?
 
As per my understanding, China, Japan and a few others are our biggest creditors.

I believe a few years ago, the debt was 14T, now it's 19T. The US has been on a Deficet spending spree for the last decade and we haven't had a surplus since.

Can somebody please educate me where the money is coming from? The traditional answer I get is from investors, foreign governments (i.e. China) and others.

But let's be honest. 19 Trillion is a lot of money and I doubt it's all from the above... If China does buy our Tres bonds, than who lends China money? Last I checked they are in a deficiet too.

I have a very bad feeling less than half of that 19T is from real sources and it's just all printed by the Fed. I just can not see how the whole world is in debt to each other, where the hell is all the money coming from????


If it weren't for the $19,000,000,000,000 in debt the markets would be 50%+ lower...all the debt is to prop up a worthless economy ....there is zero growth in the US, everything you see in the stock market is a prop job...an illusion to make you believe everything is peaches and cream but in reality it's all a fairytale.... Nothing but a fairytale .....
 
I first didn't get where the debt was coming from...

It's like playing a poker game with 100 people. Everyone is down... So... Who's the winner?????? Where did all the money go?!? If every country is in the red, than it's a poker table where everyone is down which makes no sense.
 
Back
Top