This debate again?
When you react, is your reaction a long, short, neutral, or random reaction?
Only a random reaction involves no predicting.
If your reaction is long,
WHY? Because you expect the market to go down that particular trade?
No, Because you expect the market to go up that particular trade?
No.
You expect / forecast / predict / figure / guess / whatever-verb-you-prefer that
over many trades, taking the long trade will be more profitable than going short, with a particular signal/setup.
So, this debate rages on because of
semantics:
No, we aren't predicting the next trade.
Yes, we are predicting the expectancy of taking a particular position, during a particular signal/setup, over many trades.
This is nothing new.
Weather forecasters (predictors) do it--they talk in probabilities based on long-term expectations.
The
Electron Cloud Model does it:
https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electron_cloud
"...The electron cloud model says that we cannot know exactly where an electron is at any given time, but the electrons are more likely to be in specific areas. ..."
Fallacy:
I'm not predicting it'll rain tomorrow; I'm just reacting to what the weatherman said by taking an umbrella with me.
Logic:
I'm not predicting it'll rain tomorrow; I take an umbrella with me all the time.
Logic:
I'm not predicting it'll rain tomorrow; I flip a coin to determine whether to take an umbrella.