can price action predict market moves

i am happy for you that you make money with TA/PA.
if you think extrapolation of historical data in some sort leads to decisions that longterm can generate income for you, fine.
i am not arguing about anything. fact is, technical analysis is used mainly by the retail crowd because they don't know better. i never ever saw reports from major banks showing fucking patterns on charts. i saw many research papers that show how unreliable technical analysis is though. there is no point in arguing about that point.

Then don't trade via price action. Why are u trying to create a discussion about this. Use the search tool. Its been discussed endlessly and does nothing for nobody.
 
TA/PA/FA arguments are as old as the hills, no point going blue in the face debating.
Personally it suits me other traders have rigid beliefs, the more they go down the rabbit hole the better.

Now where we, oh yes that's right, TA/PA is the best thing since sliced bread, better than magic but if you don't hold your mouth right you'll lose money.
 
once again, the main question is: does TA/PA have any predictable power?
you may think that price history shows bull/bear/sideways markets, which is true, because in a bull market price rises, in a bear market price falls and in a sideways market price consolidates. price data is just what it is, it is price history. it is what was. in a bull market you will be able to draw a trend line, by connecting certain higher lows or even higher highs of price swings. but once price breaks the higher low trend line, the TAnalyst will just redraw another line, or adjust the previous one. does this trend line have any predictable power? will price hold this line when it is reached? does it matter in a bull market if price penetrates this line?
does it matter if price forms a flag within a trend channel that breaks the higher low and then continues moving higher again?
Good morning geth03,

I am currently an unprofitable trader. So take my words with no profitable value .

I respect and appreciate the debate. Thank you.

I think what you are challenging or asking is, does PA/TA have a consistent edge. And if yes, how much of an edge (expectancy). It's a fair question. Unfortunately, I doubt anyone will answer. After someone has worked hard for years developiing a profitable edge or income for theirself , they will not reveal proof of what makes them money on an open forum. Dumb money is needed for those with proper edges to take their money. So easier to keep dumb money blind and in the rabbit hole.
 
Last edited:
look, TA/PA is subjective not objective. you can give 100 technical analysts the same 1 chart, and all fuckers will draw 100 different things on this 1 chart. after new information is available on the hard right edge, most of them will lose money.
some make money, and then those that lost money will analyze the chart of the guys who made money just by luck. after some new infomation is available, every TAnalyst will adjust the chart for new moves, draw a new trend line for example.
if one has to redraw his trend line, or support/resistance level, that means, that it didn't have any predictable ability in the first place, so why adjusting it again from past information?

"quantum mechanics to cats" my ass xD
Of course there's subjectivity involved in interpreting charts, that's what makes it a market. There are two broad groups involved in trading...those who have done the work and have identified an edge based on their interpretations AND have the disciplines to ply that edge and those who haven't and/or don't. Nobody is right all the time nor is it necessary to do very well as a trader.
 
Last edited:
Of course there's subjectivity involved in interpreting charts, that's what makes it a market. There are two broad groups involved in trading...those who have done the work and have identified an edge based on their interpretations AND have the disciplines to apply that edge and those who haven't and/or don't. Nobody is right all the time nor is it necessary to do very well as a trader.
Very well stated speedo.
 
Good morning geth03,

I am currently an unprofitable trader. So take my words with no profitable value .

I respect and appreciate the debate. Thank you.

I think what you are challenging or asking is, does PA/TA have a consistent edge. And if yes, how much of an edge (expectancy). It's a fair question. Unfortunately, I doubt anyone will answer. After someone has worked hard for years developiing a profitable edge or income for theirself , they will not reveal proof of what makes them money on an open forum. Dumb money is needed for those with proper edges to take their money. So easier to keep dumb money blind and in the rabbit hole.

let me put it that way:

there is a group of TA/PA traders that are religiously fanatical. i do not think that there is any edge in TA/PA. TAnalysts are hindsight traders, they interpret price action / price moves after the move happens! like: that 5 min bar was a bullish candle with its range 4 times that large of previous 20 bars, so this breakout is legit. than price plummets, they call it head fake, fakeout, false breakout. and once again, in hindsight it was clear that they should have sold instead of bought the fucking bullish candle.

EVERYTHING IS CRYSTAL CLEAR IN HINDSIGHT. PREVIOUS PRICE ACTION IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PRICE ACTION.

do you really think, the fucking HFT algos keep track of candle stick patterns, moving average crossovers, support and resistance levels? do you think the hedge fund guy is looking for head and shoulders patterns when he wants to hedge his exposure for an event thats coming?

lets say, one guy wants to hedge his stock exposure for the weekend. he buys 500 lots in the ES and fucks off. he is done. he leaves one fucking large green candle behind him. do you really want to make trading decisions based on his move?

how many guys of you did see track records of Al Brooks, Ken Calhoun, Steve Nison, FuturesTrader71?

there is one trader here that tries "to understand" Al Brooks for 13 YEARS NOW!!!!!
thats freakish, 13 YEARS!!!!
and still he thinks that it is his fault that he can not implement Al Brooks strategies FOR 13 YEARS!!!

look at the picture i attached. this is a prep from V-Zones.
he draws levels (his support and resistance) and price either will bounce off or trade through it.
once price trades through it can come back aka headfake or trade further on a retest aka Support becomes Resistance Level Flip.
i mean, c'mon you fucking moron. it is a no brainer that price can go up or down, is this really new information? this guy charges huge sums for this special trading course and lets people sign NDA's. every recording has the name of the course taker on it, so he can not share the course.
 

Attachments

  • V-Zones4 Blog. 16th C1.png
    V-Zones4 Blog. 16th C1.png
    80.5 KB · Views: 63
I predict the sun will rise tomorrow. And...it will appear in the East. I predict it daylight length will grow until June 20th, after which it will begin to shorten again.
How'd I do?
Exactly my point .
Though the date of 20th of June isn't written in stone as summer solstice , things like leap years / variations in earth's orbit etc, can occasionally push solstice to the day after /before. ( And dependent wether in northern or southern hemisphere).
 
Last edited:
Of course there's subjectivity involved in interpreting charts, that's what makes it a market. There are two broad groups involved in trading...those who have done the work and have identified an edge based on their interpretations AND have the disciplines to ply that edge and those who haven't and/or don't. Nobody is right all the time nor is it necessary to do very well as a trader.

how come that 100 guys looking at the one same chart come to 100 different conclusions?
one will see a head and shoulders pattern and go long, the other will see broken support becomes resistance and go short. the other 98 will see MA crossovers, RSI/MACD divergence, intermarket spread widening, candlestick pattern, huge order getting absorbed at price level xyz, market profile POC rejection, ABC swing, fibonacci, elliott wave......

if you did test your strategy and think it is statistical sound, when you have decent risk and money management strategy, if you really think you have an edge over other market participants, then yeah, go for it.
 
let me put it that way:

there is a group of TA/PA traders that are religiously fanatical. i do not think that there is any edge in TA/PA. Why do you have to think, why you can not prove there is no edge in TA/PA? IMO, a professional trader proves edge or no edge regardless of the trading theory. Would you agree. TAnalysts are hindsight traders, they interpret price action / price moves after the move happens! like: that 5 min bar was a bullish candle with its range 4 times that large of previous 20 bars, so this breakout is legit. It is legit if the past XXX to X,XXX similar breakout proves an expectancy great than 0.00. than price plummets, they call it head fake, fakeout, false breakout. and once again, in hindsight it was clear that they should have sold instead of bought the fucking bullish candle.

EVERYTHING IS CRYSTAL CLEAR IN HINDSIGHT. PREVIOUS PRICE ACTION IS NOT INDICATIVE OF FUTURE PRICE ACTION. Jim Simon says past performance is the best predictor of success. Sir, all we have is previous market behavior to have a prediction of future success.

do you really think, the fucking HFT algos keep track of candle stick patterns, moving average crossovers, support and resistance levels? I do not know what HFT algo have and they will not tell my black ass or your ass anything if they did. do you think the hedge fund guy is looking for head and shoulders patterns when he wants to hedge his exposure for an event thats coming? I do not know what hedge fund has and he will not tell my black ass or your ass anything if they did.

lets say, one guy wants to hedge his stock exposure for the weekend. he buys 500 lots in the ES and fucks off. he is done. he leaves one fucking large green candle behind him. do you really want to make trading decisions based on his move? Yes I would gladly take the trade, if the past XXX to X,XXX similar scenarios proves an expectancy great than 0.00.

how many guys of you did see track records of Al Brooks, Ken Calhoun, Steve Nison, FuturesTrader71? None of them. They are saleman with a legal
business to sale their trading theories. By law, they do not have to reveal their trading records. You understand me? By law, I can create a website and sell my trading ideas as well and present to viewers no broker statements, no trade log, no spreadsheet, no live trades, no anything. I do not have to reveal anything and I can sell to you whatever I want trading related. You or I can't do anything about this.

So sir, let me ask you this. Do you know what your job is a trader now? Your job is to prove that Al Brooks, Ken Calhoun, Steve Nison, FuturesTrader71, etc etc whomever trading ideas, setups method have expectancy greater than 0.00 or less than 0.00, and be happy about doing it if you so choose. Are you can ask for proof and make a decision that way.


there is one trader here that tries "to understand" Al Brooks for 13 YEARS NOW!!!!!
thats freakish, 13 YEARS!!!!
and still he thinks that it is his fault that he can not implement Al Brooks strategies FOR 13 YEARS!!! What if there is XXX other Al Brooks students who is successful with Brooks concept? you do not know this sir. You can not judge success on one person performance. My ass been follow the same teacher for 2 years, I am still not successful, but I been half assing not putting enough hours. Not journaling, not being consistent, making mistakes , not testing nothing. Do not base opinions on 1 person success.

look at the picture i attached. this is a prep from V-Zones.
he draws levels (his support and resistance) and price either will bounce off or trade through it.
once price trades through it can come back aka headfake or trade further on a retest aka Support becomes Resistance Level Flip.
i mean, c'mon you fucking moron. it is a no brainer that price can go up or down, is this really new information? this guy charges huge sums for this special trading course and lets people sign NDA's. every recording has the name of the course taker on it, so he can not share the course.

All in all, I appreciate these conversations. But at the end of the day, each trader is responsible for finding and proving their own edges(s) to make decent money that is worth the time and effort inputted to finding their own edges.

Hello geth03,

I appreciate the debate and conversation.

I respond to your question in blue.

Note: I am currently an unprofitable trader, so please take my comments as my own personal thoughts and experience. My comments hold NO profitable value, yet.
 
Last edited:
Tool. I wonder why you are not yet on my ignore list.

"Can price action predict market moves"? Of course it can. That's why we have charts.

Problem is you only get to "know" a little bit. And that little bit is "all you get", but it's worth trying to get on the right side of it. Beyond that, you have to play it by ear.

KISS, baby!
 
Back
Top