Quote from traderNik:
It's very surprising to see an apparently level-headed contributor suggest that this is a 'muddy' situation. Obviously you don't believe that MBT hasn't drawn up its contract in such a way that it is essentially their discretion as to whether they liquidate once valid conditions are met? Someone posted, with regard to a complaint about IB, that brokers cannot simply take money from your account and then claim its covered in the contract you signed, and that an arbitrator might find in favour of a client if there was an obvious and aggregious disregard for the rights of the client.
In this situation, could it be clearer that this is the clients fault? It seems that the client was ridiculously overleveraged, had no concept of position size relative to capital, and essentially created this problem. You seriously think that he would stand a chance in arbitration?
I feel it is actually bad advice to tell this person to go to a lawyer. It'll just be more money down the drain.
Please see sarah_iru's post above. Is this an accurate description of the circumstances? If so, it's game over.
Are you suggesting that it's the brokers responsibility to babysit the client's positions? If that's the case, it's a bizarre idea. If I'm misunderstanding you, I apologize in advance.
Where the hell did you come up with 'MBT'. This has nothing to do with them.