You're getting a lack of helpful responses (and a healthy dose of skepticism) because of the substance of your own posts... or more accurately, due to the LACK of substance in your posts.
I think this has been mentioned repeatedly before. Sophisticated investors / managers understand a Sharpe ratio is meaningless in isolation. You refuse to talk about your strategy, the instruments you trade, or detailed quant metrics (like skew/kurtosis as previously mentioned).
On the other hand, basic metrics like Sharpe (or god forbid, just plain annualized return) are OFTEN used to trick naive investors into strategies destined to failure.
So, on the off chance you're naive... then this is another reminder that talking about just these metrics is meaningless. You could claim a Sharpe of 1000 and annualized returns of 100000%, and you're not going to gain much more credibility or interest from the sophisticated people in the room.
I think this has been mentioned repeatedly before. Sophisticated investors / managers understand a Sharpe ratio is meaningless in isolation. You refuse to talk about your strategy, the instruments you trade, or detailed quant metrics (like skew/kurtosis as previously mentioned).
On the other hand, basic metrics like Sharpe (or god forbid, just plain annualized return) are OFTEN used to trick naive investors into strategies destined to failure.
So, on the off chance you're naive... then this is another reminder that talking about just these metrics is meaningless. You could claim a Sharpe of 1000 and annualized returns of 100000%, and you're not going to gain much more credibility or interest from the sophisticated people in the room.