Thanks for all your responses. I am really touched by so many enthusiastic people in this forum. However, my question is for serious full time stock investors not for traders.
Here I want to point out is that I actually mean "Investing for living" or make stock investing as my full time job. Ideally combing investing and trading will get the best result and minimize the risk. I want to be an investor and trader in the same time. I don't want to gamble my money. I don't want to be a day trader. I try to avoid short strategy. I diversify my portfolio and only purchase quality stocks. All my stocks can be a long term investment. I follow the rule. Many of you suggest that I should start with very small account to see if it would work for me. A small account is really for a trader, not for an investor. If your capital is $200K, an yearly return of 25% would be $50K. If your capital is $50K, you need to have 100% return to make $50K. Don't you have to take more risk to get 100% return? I think 25% return is not unrealistic in the year of 2005, 2006 for an "investor and trader". Unfortunately I was not in the market at that time. I don't know if there is any investing strategy to have 25% return in the recession, except gambling in very short term trading. I post my exact asset figure is trying to get advises from a full time conservative "investor and trader", who are only doing equity, not future.
I made 15% in the period of June to October last year as I had CHL, LFC, RIO, SID, RIMM, AAPL, GOOG, MON & etc. I made mistakes of selling high flying RIO, SID, MON & etc to purchase CITIBANK and Wachovia bank at price of $35 and $40. I thought financial stocks were in the bottom. I always followed technical chart to make buy and sell. I made exception for CITIBANK and Wachovia. It is a big lesson for me. In January I sold AAPL and GOOG after they drop below 200 days moving average to avoid lose more. I used the proceed to purchase more of CITIBANK and Wachovia. I didn't know sub prime problem would be that serious. When CITIBANK hit $18 Merrill Lynch strategist suggested financial stocks were still too expensive. I lose my mind of selling partial of CITIBANK at $18. I thought I would purchased them back at $15. It bounced back in four days. I've never have chances to buy back so far. I blow out my accounts in these three months. It is really a big lesson for me.
I was optimistic last year as full time "investor and trader". While NJ home price was going down and down, I thought about selling it to avoid further housing downturn, and used the proceed to add more capital in my portfolio. I can be more focus in "investing" than "trading". After I sold it, I found the economic was in recession. I don't have any idea in investing in recession. I can only put the sale proceed in the bank saving account for a very low interest rate, not mention US dollar is still depreciating. I realized that I should be a trader, not an investor in the recession. As a trader, I only need a small amount of capital. I should learn trading technique, not picking up good stocks. I should be an active trader or even day trader. I don't need to sell my NJ home. I should rent it out for a few more year. At least I have 5% return and the anticipation of bounce back of housing price. I sold the house in the very down market for a even below market price. It was completely a wrong decision. That's bothered me and drove me to the anxiety depression.
As for getting a job to make living, that would be my last choice. When you are approaching 50, it is not a good idea to get back IT field, especially after leaving for 4 years. There are plenty of young and smart new graduates with newer technology to compete with you. The employers are not interested in your old technology experiences. Of course, if I can't make money as a full time "investor and trader" in the coming recession years, I have no choice to find a job.
..