Either gamble as a gambler.., or the house
RN
I certainly understand that, and agree in both a practical and logical way.
Mark Douglas talks about though... if one was raised religiously...
I was raised an evangelical fundamentalist. Dancing... movies... and gambling... were sure fire ways to hell fire.
I'm in the 'spiritual but not religious' camp and have been for some time, but I compensate for that early upbringing somewhat by technicalities. Some states tax various kinds of income, and gambling is taxed in a certain way. Some states don't tax poker winnings the same as gambling because there is a skill beyond random involved. I assume trading is a skill, so I just choose not to use the gambling terminology either.
But if you equate gambling and risk -- trading has risk... and is at it's essence about risk... in that sense it is gambling. Even if I don't call it gambling, I don't want to take the risk out of trading. Mark Douglas talks about one of the great errors traders make is trying to take the risk out of trading.
For example, moving your stop to break even as soon as you show the slightest profit makes you feel like you have no risk -- but it is one of the surest ways to fail.
So even if I don't want to call what I do gambling, I want to embrace, accept and use... risk in a way that works for trading. Which is another way of saying to be the casino, and not the person in the casino for whom the odds work against them. Same thing RN said.
Last edited: