WHY? If it is too complicated then it can't be consistently accurate. If you can't program it . . . it's nearly worthless. Oh and it's on eBay for $100 which is still about $90 overpriced.
Can AI and a supercomputer beat the markets?
- Thread starter Tiney Winey
- Start date
Coincidentally this was the first book I read starting out 14y ago. It’s basically a long explaining of lower lows and lower highs and/or possible HS. Then within bars, as seen on a lower timeframe. I also read this book “Optures and futions”. Nothing special and it’s best to move on, but it hooked me on options, which is good thing
I still think he was one of the first pioneers on this PA trading thing (which basically is seeing a combination of pricebars and drawing a conclusion, which “indicators” were simple derivations from”). This was back from the days everyone had this this standard setup of 3 indicators on the bottom of their screen (macd, rsi etc)
I used Gemini and chatGPT to do cancer research (as a non healthcare person). Their value is when I gave them pages of data, they could summarize and categorize and group them, then once in a while, suggested inferences, which amazed me. Save me lots of time when the datasets were complex. Gemini is better because it is capable of real time search whereas chatGPT stored data in its memory and searches from there, often in cancer research is outdated.
You have to trust but verify because lots of time the answers were inaccurate.
You don't even need A.I. when central bankers will give you an 8 second head start with news announcements for a modest £5,000. I think J Powell has integrity but on our side of the pond centuries of 'integrity' have been flushed away.
Yes. AI and a supercomputer can beat the market but only for a short while.
Then a better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while.
Then an even better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while.
Then an even better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while.
Then an even better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while etc
Then 8 Qbit quantum computers beat them,
Yes. AI and a supercomputer can beat the market but only for a short while.
Then a better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while.
Then an even better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while.
Then an even better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while.
Then an even better AI and supercomputer beat it but only for a short while etc
Then 16Qbit quantum etc............
I hope you guys are aware that humans, currently, are smarter than the most updated AI now right?
Good Morning Reactive Analytics,
I agree.
Worrying about AND building AI trading systems is a complete waste of time, energy, and effort. I never seen an AI trading system that makes a lot of money every month, year after year and its a waste of time searching for such a dream.
I wasted a lot of time building trading systems. Not worth the effort.
Manual clicking is FAR easier and less complicated and more profitable and far more rewarding.
Not wasting my time on no damn AI trading systems.
That AI stuff isn't nothing but a scam, just like Bitcoin. A distraction.
Last edited:
Good Morning vanzandt,
For get these people. They are all useless for me. And I do not care about their trading performance. My trading performance is and will be better.
They not putting money in my pocket.
I am far better trader then them.
You do not know what these folks did behind the scenes to make all that money. They was probably lying, scamming, cheating, bribing, ALL kinds of stuff.
Why even think about or research them? They not going to give you no secret.