Illiquid, thanks for the interest. Recently, I have found that I would have been better served (at least when trading the equity indices) to pretend that (in a sense) no trading has ever taken place before today -- i.e. to approach each day as its own entity.
This was not always the case, and it is something that I have not conquered. I also don't think this will continue to be the case forever.
Basically, the more markets are trending, the better served you are to know what happened yesterday, the day before, etc. Price levels, S & R, all these things carry over, and it would be foolish to ignore them.
A prime example of this is ZB over the past 3 months.
See, as well, E6 (Euro). Even though it has been consolidating for the past 4 months or so, it has tended to carry over some intraday tendencies quite consistently.
ES and ER, conversely, have been very tricky. Just when you think you've seen a multi-day breakout to the long or short side, the next day the markets reverse without so much as looking back.
The astute day trader picks up on this quickly. Trend does not have to mean continuous movement in one or the other direction (at least not within the context of this discussion). In this context, consolidation and the lack of ability to breakout of the consolidation can itself be self-reinforcing (=trend), and can offer the gutsy trader very low-risk counter-trend (in the coventional sense) trades. Even not-so-astute traders such as your's truly eventually catch on (but are always wary that due to their slowness, may have caught on just as things are about to change!)
Hope this convoluted mess makes some degree of sense.
This was not always the case, and it is something that I have not conquered. I also don't think this will continue to be the case forever.
Basically, the more markets are trending, the better served you are to know what happened yesterday, the day before, etc. Price levels, S & R, all these things carry over, and it would be foolish to ignore them.
A prime example of this is ZB over the past 3 months.
See, as well, E6 (Euro). Even though it has been consolidating for the past 4 months or so, it has tended to carry over some intraday tendencies quite consistently.
ES and ER, conversely, have been very tricky. Just when you think you've seen a multi-day breakout to the long or short side, the next day the markets reverse without so much as looking back.
The astute day trader picks up on this quickly. Trend does not have to mean continuous movement in one or the other direction (at least not within the context of this discussion). In this context, consolidation and the lack of ability to breakout of the consolidation can itself be self-reinforcing (=trend), and can offer the gutsy trader very low-risk counter-trend (in the coventional sense) trades. Even not-so-astute traders such as your's truly eventually catch on (but are always wary that due to their slowness, may have caught on just as things are about to change!)
Hope this convoluted mess makes some degree of sense.
Quote from illiquid:
How much influence, if any, do you allow the previous day's action or chart/tape movement on a higher time-frame, in regards to your daytrading? Or do you prefer to wipe the slate clean of opinions and just focus on the present session? Or somewhere inbetween?
As an aside, I've always held the same attitude towards the importance of entry as you've stated earlier -- just that the vast majority of what qualifies as low-risk for me has been to enter fading momentum, rather than jumping aboard a moving train.
Nice trading btw.
Couldn't resist going to eat supper with my family.