You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Call It As I see It... Palin Won!
- Thread starter iceman1
- Start date
Quote from Vista:
Liberals don't like stories like this. It gets them all agitated and cranky. They like 'feel good' stories like the "Rainbow Fish"
http://www.fcrr.org/assessment/SLP/Joann_Handouts/The_Rainbow_Fish_PA.pdf
But, the ironic thing is, Conservatives actually do give more to charities than Democrats.
not all liberals hate guns
not all conservatives hate gays
not all liberals feel sorry for bums
not all conservatives believe in God
not all liberals like Obama
not all conservatives McCain & Palin..... but MUST REMAIN SILENT
Quote from Mercor:
Typical intolerance from Liberals. At first there was hope. You educated him on the need to post a source. Then you showed your true beliefs of stereotyping, partisanship and judgmental arrogance.
You basically invoke the death penalty on him for being a "republican". I wish you were this firm with our real criminals. [/QUOTE
If the guy is dishonest and a Republican, why is it wrong to refer to him as a dishonest Republican?
Quote from Vista:
Liberals don't like stories like this. It gets them all agitated and cranky. They like 'feel good' stories like the "Rainbow Fish"
http://www.fcrr.org/assessment/SLP/Joann_Handouts/The_Rainbow_Fish_PA.pdf
But, the ironic thing is, Conservatives actually do give more to charities than Democrats.
What about conservative Democrats?
What do THEY give?
Quote from Pa(b)st Prime:
The Palin pick has been a virtual wash. Probably a small, small net pick up for McCain.
We'll have to agree to disagree. Republican strategists are obviously trying to re-tool their big idea; Palin said today that Obama hangs out with 'terrorists'.
It's too bad, really. Palin is visually perfect and 'reads' well until she opens her mouth about anything substantive. If she only had a bigger brain she could easily have ingested enough detail to at least fake it, which is after all what most of them are doing anyway (on both sides, that is). It's not like she's above it, that much is clear.
Well Nik Obama does hang out with terrorists, no? Are you saying Bill Ayers and Dohrn (she was CONVICTED) are not terrorists?
Here's Pabst making a comment: I advocate the bombing of moveon. I do. You think my position is OVER THE TOP radical, right? Well that position is identical to Ayers. Obama hangs with the guy. Palin is 100% correct then in her assessment. Period.
Here's Pabst making a comment: I advocate the bombing of moveon. I do. You think my position is OVER THE TOP radical, right? Well that position is identical to Ayers. Obama hangs with the guy. Palin is 100% correct then in her assessment. Period.
Quote from traderNik:
We'll have to agree to disagree. Republican strategists are obviously trying to re-tool their big idea; Palin said today that Obama hangs out with 'terrorists'.
It's too bad, really. Palin is visually perfect and 'reads' well until she opens her mouth about anything substantive. If she only had a bigger brain she could easily have ingested enough detail to at least fake it, which is after all what most of them are doing anyway (on both sides, that is). It's not like she's above it, that much is clear.
Are you any less dishonest than he is? You (and a few others) are attacking the messenger when you're clearly unable to deal with the message. While he should not have started his post with "I" it's quite obvious that "his" story truly reflects the views of the ultra-leftist fraction of the democratic party.Quote from smilingsynic:
If the guy is dishonest and a Republican, why is it wrong to refer to him as a dishonest Republican?
And btw I am not a republican or conservative.
Quote from a_person:
Are you any less dishonest than he is? You (and a few others) are attacking the messenger when you're clearly unable to deal with the message. While he should not have started his post with "I" it's quite obvious that "his" story truly reflects the views of the ultra-leftist fraction of the democratic party.
And btw I am not a republican or conservative.
He was telling a lie. He was not a messenger he was a liar. Go on to the next topic please.
Of course he was, this is not in dispute. But I don't care about him, he is just an anonymous poster. I do care about the fact that even though he was telling a lie the description of the views of liberal democrats in his fictitious story was absolutely accurate. And people unable to acknowledge that are intellectually dishonest and bigger liars than he is.Quote from bigarrow:
He was telling a lie.