California’s Wealth Tax Arrives

I warned every government debt critic about the choices a US government has to bring down the debt burden. And like usual, it is always helpful to take a look back at history. Does anybody here follow the historical US federal income tax developments over time? Here you go GenX, Y, Z and don´t be shocked/upset:

upload_2024-1-12_2-49-30.png


So, how to solve a lousy $24 Trillion problem? Hum, the US government WILL COME FOR YOU! History repeats!

upload_2024-1-12_2-51-0.jpeg


 
https://www.wsj.com/articles/california-wealth-tax-bill-sacramento-democrats-gavin-newsom-f0c723b6

Democrats want to tax assets to fill the state’s $68 billion budget hole.

By

The Editorial Board
Jan. 9, 2024 6:34 pm ET

1840
im-910304

California Gov. Gavin Newsom
Progressive ideas that originate in California have a habit of spreading. So it’s worth paying attention to legislation moving in Sacramento to establish a wealth tax on high earners and a bounty-hunter scheme for plaintiff attorneys to target alleged tax dodgers.

Democrats introduced the bill last winter, and it will get a hearing Wednesday in the state Assembly as lawmakers scrounge for revenue to fill a projected $68 billion budget hole. Gov. Gavin Newsom on Wednesday will also unveil his budget for the coming year. Democratic legislators are proposing a wealth tax as an alternative to spending restraint.

The bill would impose an annual excise tax of 1.5% on the worldwide net worth of every full- and part-year California resident that exceeds $1 billion, starting this tax year. Come Jan. 1, 2026, the state would tax wealth that exceeds $50 million at a rate of 1% each year, with an additional 0.5% tax on assets valued at more than $1 billion.

Part-time residents would be taxed on a pro rata share of their wealth based on the number of days they spend annually in California. The tax would also apply to nonresidents who have recently left the state. You can check out of the state, but you would still have to pay California’s wealth tax if you do.

Advertisement - Scroll to Continue

The wealth tax would apply to nearly all assets, including shares in a partnership, private-equity interests, artwork and financial assets held offshore. California’s Franchise Tax Board would value assets that aren’t publicly traded. That means private businesses located outside the state could be examined by the board’s auditors and appraisers.

It’s worth noting that Democrats exempted real property from the tax as a favor to their high-end real-estate industry and Hollywood donors. This carve-out would encourage the wealthy to shift more of their investments into real estate. Perhaps Democrats are trying to ameliorate the damage from local mansion taxes in San Francisco and Los Angeles on real-estate sales.

To spread the wealth around to plaintiff-bar donors, the bill would apply the state’s False Claims Act to wealth-tax records and statements. This means plaintiff attorneys could sue affluent individuals on behalf of the state for allegedly under-reporting assets. Plaintiff attorneys would be entitled to a share of the state’s recovery.

The wealth tax would raise an estimated $21.6 billion in revenue annually, assuming no wealth exodus in the state. Yet this is still far less than California’s budget deficit in this fiscal year. Nor does it cover the $27 billion increase in California’s Medicaid spending over the last four years. Medicaid spending this year will swell even more as the state expands eligibility to all undocumented migrants.

Meantime, California’s top effective marginal tax rate on wage income this year is increasing to 14.4% from 13.3% owing to a new law that removes the $145,600 wage ceiling on a 1.1% state employee payroll tax to fund expanded paid family leave. You almost have to wonder if Democrats are trying to drive away more businesses and high earners.

The wealth-tax bill reveals yet again Sacramento’s voracious appetite to levy new taxes to support more spending. The tax-and-spend ratchet never ends. But even California’s wealthy can’t pay for its ever-expanding welfare and government-worker obligations, so don’t be surprised when Democrats eventually target the middle class again too.
The one main reason for the deficit: Most billionaires moved their legal residency out of CA.

Things will get worse if mere multimillionaires also moved their legal residency out of CA, it will be the hollowing out of the golden state when all the golden geese are gone.
 
CA exists only because of Hollywood & the VCs in SiliValley. It is almost entirely dependent upon the IPOs to continue to fund its expenses. Any year without IPO money is a down year for CA. And both Hollywood & the VCs are already diversifying away from CA (Hollywood to Atlanta & Toronto).

The county I live in CA has a sales tax of 10.75% (Alameda County). I don't even bother buying anything retail that I can get on craigslist anymore. This is only the beginning, without the Billionaires CA will be bankrupt just like Illinois. PG&E wants to charge higher & higher so they can fund their $50 million CEO salary. This state is real joke.
 
I left California for Singapore. Here max income tax rate is 15%, no tax on anything else, a trader's dream, right?

Except, a car costs price + 100% import duty tax + $80k COE tax (road usage fee, yes, you read that right). Yet, the city/country is filled with exotic and opulent cars.

You think parts of the US are expensive? Our 1700 sqft apartment in an aging 80s upscale condo complex just sold for $1.8M. Typical rent today is $6k/month.

One way or another, you pay.
 
If you really wanted to be progressive you pass a law along the idea put forth by Buffet;

“You could end the deficit in five minutes. You just pass a law that says that anytime there is a deficit of more than 3% of GDP, all sitting members of Congress are ineligible for reelection,"

"Now you've got the incentives in the right place. So it's capable of being done. ... A more effective threat would be just to say, if you guys can't get it done, we'll get some other guys to get it done."

Do you hear the rich businessmen leave? Leaving as soon as they can! It is the sound of all of the businesses packing up and never coming back...

Good luck to California, choking off the golden geese while forcing them to lay more eggs and lay them faster.
 
I left California for Singapore. Here max income tax rate is 15%, no tax on anything else, a trader's dream, right?

Except, a car costs price + 100% import duty tax + $80k COE tax (road usage fee, yes, you read that right). Yet, the city/country is filled with exotic and opulent cars.

You think parts of the US are expensive? Our 1700 sqft apartment in an aging 80s upscale condo complex just sold for $1.8M. Typical rent today is $6k/month.

One way or another, you pay.

So where do you live now in Singapore when you have sold your condo? Congrats on the massive profit btw. The reason why Singapore puts such high cost for owning a car is that the place is small; it's a city state which is a country that's the size of the city. If they don't raise the cost of owning a car and let everybody drive a car, all of the streets would be a parking lot; nobody will be able to go anywhere. And besides why would you want to drive around in such a small place like Singapore anyway besides showing off your wealth especially when it has a fantastic public transit system from what I heard that's far-reaching, convenient, clean and fast?
 
Back
Top