California lawmakers train sights on gun ownership

For those who may yet be undecided...
Read all the gun threads that have come up lately and tell me who you trust to be allowed to possess a gun.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Good point. We would have to include belts.

But you really want your little toys don't you? At the expense of thousands of murdered people. Seems pretty damn selfish to me. This position allows the kind of evil we saw in CT. You and your gun-nut friends are accessories to evil. By keeping this position you are saying it's ok that in the future another class of kids are killed.
More...

Your ignorance on this subject and haughty condescending arrogance apparently knows no bounds.
 
Quote from BSAM:

For those who may yet be undecided...
Read all the gun threads that have come up lately and tell me who you trust to be allowed to possess a gun.
More...

For all those decided and undecided , wouldn't you be the best person to determine whether you own a gun or not?
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

You and your gun-nut friends are accessories to evil.
More...

This reminds me. There are a large amount of people who never owned, saw or fired a gun till they joined the military. I suppose then a "gun nut friend" might be your local recruiter.

I'm sure the Fed gov't gave birth to a fair share of gun nuts.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

Don't need assault weapons, handguns or large magazines. Period.
More...

I'll keep mine, thanks.

You are, of course, free to turn yours in but guys like you don't make decisions for guys like me.
 
Quote from futurecurrents:

The gun-nuts prove their label by not admitting...

We don't need assault weapons, handguns or large magazines.
More...

I'll admit that most if not all the recent mass shooters, over the past few years, were prescribed antidepressant meds or the like... tackling the problem at it's source, mental health would make more sense as those intent to doing harm will find a method to carry out their evil deeds. The worst mass murders have used explosives not guns.

Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot to name a few all started their regimes by controlling and disarming civilians. The downside to gun control, the possible horrific civil liberty violations are too great to be exchanged for the facade of today's gun control safety legislation. The Constitutional Framers understood this, that's why it's not only allowed but encouraged by our Constitution.

Limiting access to those mentally unstable would be the logical first step, and would have prevented Sandy Hook. Controlling access inside the school and posting a armed guard would have prevented Sandy Hook. Disarming the law-abiding citizen only makes them a potential victim.
 
Quote from Wallet:


Limiting access to those mentally unstable would be the logical first step, and would have prevented Sandy Hook. Controlling access inside the school and posting a armed guard would have prevented Sandy Hook. Disarming the law-abiding citizen only makes them a potential victim.
More...
If "criminals are always going to be able to get guns," then why won't crazy people always be able to get guns?
 
from futurecurrents:

You and your gun-nut friends are accessories to evil.
More...

I see and your ilk using the Joseph Goebbels approach .

Tell a lie often enough it becomes the truth.

Sorry buddy but I 'm not going to give up the 2nd amendment because some clowns want us to.
 
Quote from Ricter:

If "criminals are always going to be able to get guns," then why won't crazy people always be able to get guns?
More...

How they gonna get them if they're institutionalized?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top