They'll get unemployment.
So that’s the way the cookie crumbles. If you can’t afford to pay people living wages do you really have a viable business or are you actually sucking off of the system by underpaying workers?
Many people forget what it took to get places like Walmart to raise their wages, while they were making literally billions in profit while their workers were on food stamps and Medicaid.
Don’t think for a second underpaying workers comes at no cost to tax payers.
So why don't we pay them $50 an hour? Or more?
This business closes up, the state loses the tax dollars. The employees also stop paying state tax and start collecting UE like Tony says.
State loses, employer loses, employee loses. Well done. Oh, and community loses in the form of less retail (though a solid argument can be made that less sugar from this place benefits the community!)
They will, you're correct.
Not sure that's the smart endgame, but whatever floats yer boat!
So why don't we pay them $50 an hour? Or more?
This business closes up, the state loses the tax dollars. The employees also stop paying state tax and start collecting UE like Tony says.
State loses, employer loses, employee loses. Well done. Oh, and community loses in the form of less retail (though a solid argument can be made that less sugar from this place benefits the community!)