Stocks or Indexes.... ????
The right answer lies in that fact that your position moves to your target area sometime within your time frame.... be it the stock or the security.
I tend to agree with Phil... since volatiilty is a huge part of the success of Calendar spreads... there are more candidates of the securities nature than indexes.
On the other hand... indexes do lend a more predictable movement.... without earnings reports... and major events.
One rule I feel that is important.... is the amount of premium you can take in on the short positoin relative to the long position.
I always check the ATM or close as possible to see if I can get 30% of the long position when I sell my short position. Of course the longer you go out in time with your long positions... the more costly.. and hence more difficult to bring in at least 30%. One exception may be.. a movement play on earnings.... Calendar spreads.. OTM... are fun to play on earnings... little risk.. for some great reward... if you're right. Or play them both ways... and just hope for some movement!
It's funny.. .how people characterize the Calendar strategy as one where you would like the security to move slowly up... or remain stagnant.... but in reality.. it's just how you put on the position.... it can really be anytype of strategy you would like.
I remember a few years back... you could bring in 25% on the front month QQQQ's when buying a LEAP. It only took four or five months to pay for the LEAP.... now that was some good Calendar premium.
Again.. I still favor the Put Calendar spreads.... the volatility and movement work together to create some awesome positions.
Just a Side Note: One of our investment group members only does Calendars. He buys companies which have been really beaten down... have liquidity.... and he buys the longest possible LEAPs available. He then sells short term months at resistance areas... This strategy has produced yearly returns for the past three years around 35%. He thinks of it as the 'Warren Buffet" of options strategy. Buys undervalued, beaten up companies.. and takes in the premium every month during the recovery period. Usually after six months or so... he has his LEAP completely paid for.... It's an interesting strategy.. and at times requires some margin... as the stock may not be bottomed out... but... at least as of today... he's doing great. It definitely... is a stomach ULCER.... type strategy.
M~
The right answer lies in that fact that your position moves to your target area sometime within your time frame.... be it the stock or the security.
I tend to agree with Phil... since volatiilty is a huge part of the success of Calendar spreads... there are more candidates of the securities nature than indexes.
On the other hand... indexes do lend a more predictable movement.... without earnings reports... and major events.
One rule I feel that is important.... is the amount of premium you can take in on the short positoin relative to the long position.
I always check the ATM or close as possible to see if I can get 30% of the long position when I sell my short position. Of course the longer you go out in time with your long positions... the more costly.. and hence more difficult to bring in at least 30%. One exception may be.. a movement play on earnings.... Calendar spreads.. OTM... are fun to play on earnings... little risk.. for some great reward... if you're right. Or play them both ways... and just hope for some movement!
It's funny.. .how people characterize the Calendar strategy as one where you would like the security to move slowly up... or remain stagnant.... but in reality.. it's just how you put on the position.... it can really be anytype of strategy you would like.
I remember a few years back... you could bring in 25% on the front month QQQQ's when buying a LEAP. It only took four or five months to pay for the LEAP.... now that was some good Calendar premium.
Again.. I still favor the Put Calendar spreads.... the volatility and movement work together to create some awesome positions.
Just a Side Note: One of our investment group members only does Calendars. He buys companies which have been really beaten down... have liquidity.... and he buys the longest possible LEAPs available. He then sells short term months at resistance areas... This strategy has produced yearly returns for the past three years around 35%. He thinks of it as the 'Warren Buffet" of options strategy. Buys undervalued, beaten up companies.. and takes in the premium every month during the recovery period. Usually after six months or so... he has his LEAP completely paid for.... It's an interesting strategy.. and at times requires some margin... as the stock may not be bottomed out... but... at least as of today... he's doing great. It definitely... is a stomach ULCER.... type strategy.
M~