Cakes and Flowers
Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling on a baker's refusal to make a cake for a gay wedding (he was within his rights) did not set a clear precedent for other cases, so another case may head up to the top court regarding a similar issue. This time it's about a Washington state florist who refused to provide flowers for a gay wedding—Arlene's Flowers was found in violation of state law and, backed by the same Christian non-profit that defended Masterpiece Cakeshop, the proprietor has appealed to the Supreme Court. NBC
Yesterday's Supreme Court ruling on a baker's refusal to make a cake for a gay wedding (he was within his rights) did not set a clear precedent for other cases, so another case may head up to the top court regarding a similar issue. This time it's about a Washington state florist who refused to provide flowers for a gay wedding—Arlene's Flowers was found in violation of state law and, backed by the same Christian non-profit that defended Masterpiece Cakeshop, the proprietor has appealed to the Supreme Court. NBC